Validated models for pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review suggesting how to improve validation procedures
Pierpaolo Mincarone, Antonella Bodini, Maria Rosaria Tumolo, Federico Vozzi, Silvia Rocchiccioli, Gualtiero Pelosi, Chiara Caselli, Saverio Sabina, Carlo Giacomo Leo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.27.20239301
Pierpaolo Mincarone
aNational Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Brindisi (ITALY)
PhDAntonella Bodini
bNational Research Council, Institute for Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies “Enrico Magenes”, Milano (ITALY)
PhDMaria Rosaria Tumolo
aNational Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Brindisi (ITALY)
dNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce (ITALY)
M.Sc.Federico Vozzi
cNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa (ITALY)
PhDSilvia Rocchiccioli
cNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa (ITALY)
PhDGualtiero Pelosi
cNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa (ITALY)
MDChiara Caselli
cNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa (ITALY)
PhDSaverio Sabina
dNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce (ITALY)
M.ScCarlo Giacomo Leo
dNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce (ITALY)
PhDData Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and in its supplementary information files.
Posted November 30, 2020.
Validated models for pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review suggesting how to improve validation procedures
Pierpaolo Mincarone, Antonella Bodini, Maria Rosaria Tumolo, Federico Vozzi, Silvia Rocchiccioli, Gualtiero Pelosi, Chiara Caselli, Saverio Sabina, Carlo Giacomo Leo
medRxiv 2020.11.27.20239301; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.27.20239301
Validated models for pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review suggesting how to improve validation procedures
Pierpaolo Mincarone, Antonella Bodini, Maria Rosaria Tumolo, Federico Vozzi, Silvia Rocchiccioli, Gualtiero Pelosi, Chiara Caselli, Saverio Sabina, Carlo Giacomo Leo
medRxiv 2020.11.27.20239301; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.27.20239301
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (322)
- Allergy and Immunology (625)
- Anesthesia (162)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (2340)
- Dermatology (205)
- Emergency Medicine (374)
- Epidemiology (11707)
- Forensic Medicine (10)
- Gastroenterology (693)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3693)
- Geriatric Medicine (347)
- Health Economics (632)
- Health Informatics (2372)
- Health Policy (927)
- Hematology (340)
- HIV/AIDS (773)
- Medical Education (364)
- Medical Ethics (104)
- Nephrology (396)
- Neurology (3456)
- Nursing (195)
- Nutrition (520)
- Oncology (1805)
- Ophthalmology (533)
- Orthopedics (218)
- Otolaryngology (286)
- Pain Medicine (231)
- Palliative Medicine (66)
- Pathology (444)
- Pediatrics (1021)
- Primary Care Research (416)
- Public and Global Health (6093)
- Radiology and Imaging (1261)
- Respiratory Medicine (821)
- Rheumatology (375)
- Sports Medicine (320)
- Surgery (397)
- Toxicology (50)
- Transplantation (171)
- Urology (145)