TY - JOUR T1 - Validated models for pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review suggesting how to improve validation procedures JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.27.20239301 SP - 2020.11.27.20239301 AU - Pierpaolo Mincarone AU - Antonella Bodini AU - Maria Rosaria Tumolo AU - Federico Vozzi AU - Silvia Rocchiccioli AU - Gualtiero Pelosi AU - Chiara Caselli AU - Saverio Sabina AU - Carlo Giacomo Leo Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.27.20239301.abstract N2 - An overuse of invasive and non-invasive anatomical testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) affects patients’ and healthcare professionals’ safety, and the sustainability of Healthcare Systems. Pre-test probability (PTP) models can be routinely used as gatekeeper for initial patient management. Although with different positions, international organizations clearly underline the need for more information on the various risk factors acting as modifier of the PTP.This systematic review addresses validation of PTP models adopting variables available at the first-line assessment of a suspected stable CAD. A comprehensive search has been done in MEDLINE®, HealthSTAR, and Global Health databases.Nearly all the models considered in the 27 analysed papers include age, sex, and chest pain symptoms. Other common risk factors are smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. Only one model considers genetic profile. Reported AUCs range from 0.51 to 0.81. Relevant heterogeneity sources have been highlighted, such as the sample size, the presence of a PTP cut-off and the adoption of different definitions of CAD which can prevent comparisons of results. Very few papers address a complete validation, making then impossible to understand the reasons why the model does not show a good discrimination capability on a different data set.We consequently recommend a more clear statement of endpoints, their consistent measurement both in the derivation and validation phases, more comprehensive validation analyses and the enhancement of threshold validations of PTP to assess the effects of PTP on clinical management.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPart of this work was supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 689068 - Project "Simulation Modeling of coronary ARTery disease: a tool for clinical decision support (SMARTool)". This publication reflects only the authors view and the Commission, which has no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript, is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The financial grant has been assigned only to the Institute of Clinical Physiology of Pisa. CGL and PM received reimbursement for project meetings under this grant. The funding source had no role in the study. All the authors are independent from funders, had full access to all of the data in the study, and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the dataAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N.A:All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and in its supplementary information files. ER -