Medical Ethics

Sign Up for Subject Area Alerts

Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas
D Wilkinson, H Zohny, A Kappes, W Sinnott-Armstrong, J Savulescu

medRxiv 2020.10.06.20207662; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.06.20207662

Add to Selected Citations
AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
Nikola Biller-Andorno, Andrea Ferrario, Susanne Joebges, Tanja Krones, Federico Massini, Phyllis Barth, Georgios Arampatzis, Michael Krauthammer

medRxiv 2020.08.17.20171769; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20171769

Add to Selected Citations
Challenges and proposed solutions in making clinical research on COVID-19 ethical. A status quo analysis across German research ethics committees
Alice Faust, Anna Sierawska, Katharina Krueger, Anne Wisgalla, Joerg Hasford, Daniel Strech

medRxiv 2020.08.11.20168773; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.20168773

Add to Selected Citations
PROTOCOL: Are investigators' access to trial data and rights to publish restricted and are trial participants informed about this? A comparison of trial protocols and informed consent materials.
Asger Sand Paludan-Muller, Karsten J Joergensen, Peter C Goetszche

medRxiv 2020.08.13.20174177; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.13.20174177

Add to Selected Citations
Application of Social Vulnerability Index to Identify High- risk Population of Contracting COVID-19 Infection: a state-level study.
Odalys Estefania Lara Garcia, Violeta Alvarez Retamales, Oswaldo A Madrid Suarez, Priyanka Parajuli, Susan Hingle, Robert Robinson

medRxiv 2020.08.03.20166983; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.03.20166983

Add to Selected Citations
Rationing and triage of scarce, lifesaving therapy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - a cross-sectional, social media-driven, scenario-based online query of societal attitudes
Oliver J. Muensterer, Emilio A. Gianicolo, Norbert W. Paul

medRxiv 2020.07.28.20163360; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.28.20163360

Add to Selected Citations
The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back: a survey of researchers and ethics committee members views on research ethics reviews in Australia.
Anna Scott, Iain Chalmers, Adrian Barnett, Alexandre Stephens, Simon E Kolstoe, Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou

medRxiv 2020.07.22.20159533; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.20159533

Add to Selected Citations
A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal
Erin Peebles, Marissa Scandlyn, Blair Hesp

medRxiv 2020.06.09.20126904; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.09.20126904

Add to Selected Citations
Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the public's perspective
Fariba Asghari, Alireza Parsapour, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki

medRxiv 2020.06.10.20127290; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.10.20127290

Add to Selected Citations
PROTOCOL: Are clinical trial participants informed about potential benefits and harms? A comparison of informed consent materials and trial protocols
Asger Sand Paludan-Mueller, Karsten J Joergensen, Peter C Goetzsche

medRxiv 2020.05.18.20100917; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.18.20100917

Add to Selected Citations

Pages