Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Assessing Health Systems-level Feasibility of Task-Sharing and -Shifting: Cross-sectional Study from Indian District Hospitals

View ORCID ProfileSiddhesh Zadey, Yash Jawale
doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.24.26349243
Siddhesh Zadey
1Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India
2GEMINI Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham NC USA
3Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York NY USA
4Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Siddhesh Zadey
  • For correspondence: sidzadey{at}asarforindia.org
Yash Jawale
1Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India
5Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Low- and lower-middle-income countries face chronic deficits in specialist surgeons, particularly in rural and remote settings. Task-sharing and -shifting (TSS) to other health worker cadres is a remedy supported by effectiveness studies. However, policy adoption depends not only on effectiveness but also on feasibility at the health systems level, especially when personnel deficits co-occur across multiple cadres. We aimed to develop and apply an analytic approach to assess whether co-occurring workforce deficits constrain the feasibility of surgical TSS using a pan-Indian sample of district hospitals.

Methods We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive analysis using administrative staffing data from the National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog assessment of 707 district hospitals for the 2017–18 financial year. Cadre-wise staffing ratios for specialist surgeons, general doctors, nurses, and paramedics were calculated using Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS) norms. A ratio <1 indicated a staffing deficit. We evaluated TSS feasibility for selected cadre pairs, with target and substituting cadres, using a rule-based categorization of relative staffing adequacy (not needed, possible, strained, unlikely, or not possible).

Results Across 479 hospitals with deficits in specialist surgeons or general doctors included in the analysis. Staffing deficits were widespread across cadres. Only one hospital demonstrated TSS feasibility across all cadre pairs. For general doctors substituting specialist surgeons, TSS was possible in 1.5% of hospitals, strained in 9.0%, unlikely in 78.7%, and not possible in 10.9%. Similar patterns were observed for nurses substituting for specialist surgeons and for those substituting for general doctors. Feasibility was higher when paramedics substituted for general doctors or nurses, but co-occurring deficits were common.

Conclusion Co-occurring workforce deficits substantially limit health systems-level feasibility of surgical task-sharing and -shifting in Indian district hospitals. Evaluation of TSS interventions should incorporate system-level workforce constraints in addition to evidence of effectiveness.

Competing Interest Statement

Siddhesh Zadey serves as the cofounding director of the Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Chair of the Asia Working Group of the G4 Alliance, Fellow at the Lancet Commission on a Citizen Centred Health System for India, and Drafting Committee Member for the Maharashtra State Mental Health Policy. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This article uses publicly available hospital-level aggregate data. It does not include human participant or animal subject data. Hence, approval from an ethics committee/institutional review board was not considered required.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest statement: Siddhesh Zadey serves as the co-founding director of the Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Chair of the Asia Working Group of the G4 Alliance, Fellow at the Lancet Commission on a Citizen-Centred Health System for India, and Drafting Committee Member for the Maharashtra State Mental Health Policy. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Funding statement: None.

  • Generative AI use statement: We have used ChatGPT and Grammarly AI to improve language.

  • Ethics Statement: This article uses publicly available hospital-level aggregate data. It does not include human participant or animal subject data. Hence, approval from an ethics committee/ institutional review board was not considered required.

  • Data sharing statement: Source data are available at https://www.niti.gov.in/verticals/health-and-family-welfare (DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/y79bg). Data generated by the authors can be requested from the corresponding author.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 26, 2026.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Health Systems-level Feasibility of Task-Sharing and -Shifting: Cross-sectional Study from Indian District Hospitals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessing Health Systems-level Feasibility of Task-Sharing and -Shifting: Cross-sectional Study from Indian District Hospitals
Siddhesh Zadey, Yash Jawale
medRxiv 2026.03.24.26349243; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.24.26349243
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Assessing Health Systems-level Feasibility of Task-Sharing and -Shifting: Cross-sectional Study from Indian District Hospitals
Siddhesh Zadey, Yash Jawale
medRxiv 2026.03.24.26349243; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.24.26349243

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (868)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4483)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (615)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15283)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1134)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6651)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4606)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1624)
  • Hematology (545)
  • HIV/AIDS (1276)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15965)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1111)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (675)
  • Neurology (6699)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1153)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3370)
  • Ophthalmology (989)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (670)
  • Pediatrics (1704)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (700)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5497)
  • Public and Global Health (9288)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2225)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1202)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (721)
  • Sports Medicine (536)
  • Surgery (722)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (267)