Effectiveness of a 12-week multicomponent occupational lifestyle intervention to increase physical activity among Japanese teleworkers: a cluster randomised controlled trial (TELEWORK study)

Evidence before this study Teleworking has increased globally, particularly following the coronavirus disease pandemic, and has been associated with reduced physical activity and increased sedentary behaviour, both of which are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have also reported that telework environments may contribute to musculoskeletal and other somatic symptoms. Multicomponent interventions in traditional office settings can effectively increase physical activity and reduce sedentary time. These interventions commonly employ strategies at multiple levels of the social–ecological model, including individual approaches (e.g., lectures or incentives), interpersonal approaches (e.g., team-based activities), environmental modifications (e.g., office rearrangements or sit-stand desks), and organisational support (e.g., leadership encouragement). The applicability of such interventions to teleworking populations remains unclear because teleworkers face distinct challenges such as social isolation, blurred work–life boundaries, and heterogeneous home working environments. These contextual differences highlight the need for interventions specifically tailored to teleworkers.

Added value of this study We evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent occupational lifestyle intervention specifically designed for teleworkers, a population whose work environment differs substantially from traditional office settings. Our findings provide novel evidence that can inform the development of more targeted strategies to promote physical activity in evolving work environments. This study also provides objective measurements of physical activity using accelerometers, enabling detailed evaluation of step counts, sedentary time, and different activity intensities among teleworkers. Additionally, we used daily diaries to distinguish activity patterns across workdays, weekends, teleworking days, and commuting days, providing a nuanced understanding of behavioural patterns in remote work contexts.

Implications of all the available evidence Our findings indicate that low-cost, remotely delivered multicomponent interventions may be insufficient to produce meaningful behavioural change among teleworkers. Similar strategies, including individual, physical, and organisational components, have been effective in traditional workplace interventions; however, their implementation in teleworking environments may not adequately address the specific challenges faced by remote workers. In particular, the lack of strong sociocultural support mechanisms, such as team-based step competitions or workplace champions, may limit engagement and reduce the effectiveness of such programmes. Therefore, further investigation is needed to explore more diverse and targeted intervention strategies, identify the specific needs and behavioural patterns of teleworkers, and apply more precise eligibility criteria to better address heterogeneity within teleworking populations.