Abstract
Background Guardian Waiting Shelters (GWSs) are an essential component of the Malawi’s health care system as they serve as a temporary home for patient guardians while taking care of their relatives admitted to the hospital. Despite GWSs valuable role in healthcare settings, there have been few studies on the specific experiences, infrastructure, and conditions provided at these facilities. The study examines GWS management structures and conditions, as well as guardian satisfaction and perception of health risks related to GWS use.
Methods In this cross-sectional, mixed-methods study, we assessed 12 GWSs from 12 districts in the southern region of Malawi. Qualitative data included interviews (n=149) and focus group discussions with patient guardians (n=72), as well as interviews with GWS caretakers (n=5), representatives from Hospital Management (n=12) and Hospital Advisory Committees (n=11). Quantitative data included structured assessments (n=12) of infrastructure present and used at GWSs. Descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis were utilized for data analysis, and a problem tree analysis was used to triangulate and summarize the findings.
Results 249 participants, including 221 being patient guardians, participated across the 12 GWSs. Each GWS had an average of 100 users daily, primarily middle-aged females (71%). There was a lack of clear and consistent management and responsibility for GWS operation and maintenance. GWS infrastructure conditions were poor, with inadequate functional sleeping rooms, insufficient access to water and sanitation facilities, and limited facilities for hygienic food preparation. Notably, 50% of the GWSs lacked water access, and a quarter had non-functional toilets. Overall, guardians felt unsafe and at risk of disease transmission when staying within GWS.
Conclusion Study findings highlight lack of clear, consistent GWS ownership as a root cause of challenges in GWSs. Clear policy and operational standards must be established for effective management and smooth functioning of GWSs in Malawi.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This was work funded wholly by the Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute (RGHI). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the RGHI.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the National Health Science Research Committee of Malawi (P No. 21/11/2822) and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee, UK (Ref 2655).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability Statement
All data referred to within this study available in a repository upon acceptance.
