Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

“This guideline is not practical; it might be practical to specialists like you”: Doctors’ experiences of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline in Nigeria; A qualitative study

View ORCID ProfileObianuju Beatrice Ozoh, Sandra Kelechi Dede, View ORCID ProfileJoy Nkiru Eze, View ORCID ProfileKevin Mortimer, View ORCID ProfileMartha Chinouya
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.14.22281114
Obianuju Beatrice Ozoh
1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Nigeria
2Department of Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Obianuju Beatrice Ozoh
Sandra Kelechi Dede
2Department of Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joy Nkiru Eze
3Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joy Nkiru Eze
Kevin Mortimer
4Department of Respiratory Medicine, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
5Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin Mortimer
Martha Chinouya
6Faculty of Education, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martha Chinouya
  • For correspondence: Martha.Chinouya{at}lstmed.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report sets out updated evidence-based strategy for asthma management. Little is known about how this report is perceived and implemented in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria. We explored the experiences of asthma management as informed by the current GINA guideline among doctors in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods Using a qualitative research approach, in-depth interviews were conducted among doctors in Lagos, Nigeria to explore their experiences of asthma management in the context of the current GINA report. The thematic framework approach was used for data analysis.

Results Eleven doctors (five general practitioners (GPs) and six Family Physicians (FPs) took part. Four overarching themes were identified:

  1. Knowledge of, and attitude towards the GINA strategy: Whilst most doctors were aware of the existence of the GINA report, there was limited knowledge about its content including current recommendations for mild asthma treatment.

  2. Asthma diagnosis and treatment: There was limited access to lung function testing facilities and its role in asthma diagnosis was underappreciated.

  3. Barriers to managing asthma according to GINA recommendations: These included complexity of the GINA report, unavailability and unaffordability of asthma medicines and poor patient adherence to medications, driven by socio-cultural factors.

  4. Enablers of GINA-recommended asthma management: Improvement in asthma education for doctors and the general population and better access to diagnostic tests and medicines.

Conclusion Whilst there was awareness of the existence of the GINA report, there was limited knowledge about its content and several barriers to its implementation were reported. Education about the GINA report, investment in diagnostic and treatment services and simplification of recommendations were identified as possible solutions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for this work

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was obtained from the Masters Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) (APP No.:GH21(01)); and the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Lagos, Nigeria (Assigned No.: ADM/DCST/HREC/APP/4046).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

  • Abbreviations

    CRD
    Chronic respiratory diseases
    DALYs
    Disability Adjusted Life Years
    FPs
    Family physicians
    GPs
    General Practitioners
    GINA
    Global Initiative for Asthma
    ICS
    Inhaled corticosteroids
    LMIC
    Low-income and Middle-Income Countries
    NCD
    Non-communicable disease
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted October 17, 2022.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    “This guideline is not practical; it might be practical to specialists like you”: Doctors’ experiences of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline in Nigeria; A qualitative study
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    “This guideline is not practical; it might be practical to specialists like you”: Doctors’ experiences of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline in Nigeria; A qualitative study
    Obianuju Beatrice Ozoh, Sandra Kelechi Dede, Joy Nkiru Eze, Kevin Mortimer, Martha Chinouya
    medRxiv 2022.10.14.22281114; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.14.22281114
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    “This guideline is not practical; it might be practical to specialists like you”: Doctors’ experiences of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline in Nigeria; A qualitative study
    Obianuju Beatrice Ozoh, Sandra Kelechi Dede, Joy Nkiru Eze, Kevin Mortimer, Martha Chinouya
    medRxiv 2022.10.14.22281114; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.14.22281114

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Respiratory Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (434)
    • Allergy and Immunology (760)
    • Anesthesia (222)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (3316)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (366)
    • Dermatology (282)
    • Emergency Medicine (480)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1175)
    • Epidemiology (13403)
    • Forensic Medicine (19)
    • Gastroenterology (900)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5182)
    • Geriatric Medicine (483)
    • Health Economics (786)
    • Health Informatics (3286)
    • Health Policy (1146)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1199)
    • Hematology (432)
    • HIV/AIDS (1024)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14657)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (917)
    • Medical Education (478)
    • Medical Ethics (128)
    • Nephrology (526)
    • Neurology (4957)
    • Nursing (263)
    • Nutrition (735)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (889)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (797)
    • Oncology (2531)
    • Ophthalmology (730)
    • Orthopedics (284)
    • Otolaryngology (348)
    • Pain Medicine (323)
    • Palliative Medicine (90)
    • Pathology (547)
    • Pediatrics (1308)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (552)
    • Primary Care Research (559)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4225)
    • Public and Global Health (7526)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1717)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1022)
    • Respiratory Medicine (982)
    • Rheumatology (480)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (500)
    • Sports Medicine (425)
    • Surgery (551)
    • Toxicology (73)
    • Transplantation (237)
    • Urology (206)