Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model

Anu Rebbapragada, Lane Cariazo, David Elchuk, Hossam Abdelrahman, Dang Pham, Nirochile Joseph, Elena Gouzenkova, Harpreet Gill, Peter Blecher
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.12.22278567
Anu Rebbapragada
1Microbix Corporation, Ontario, Canada
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anu.rebbapragada@microbix.com
Lane Cariazo
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Elchuk
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hossam Abdelrahman
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dang Pham
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nirochile Joseph
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Gouzenkova
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harpreet Gill
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Blecher
2FH Health, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical need for rapid and accurate molecular diagnostic testing. The Cue COVID-19 Point of Care Test (Cue POCT) is a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), authorized by Health Canada and FDA as a POCT for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Cue POCT was deployed at a network of clinics in Ontario, Canada with n=13,848 patrons tested between July 17, 2021 to January 31, 2022. The clinical performance and operational experience with Cue POCT was examined for this testing population composed mostly of asymptomatic individuals (93.7%). A head-to-head prospective clinical verification was performed between July 17 to October 4 for all POCT service clients (n= 3037) with paired COVID-19 testing by Cue and RT-PCR. Prospective verification demonstrated a clinical sensitivity of 100% and clinical specificity of 99.4% for Cue COVID-19 POCT. The lack of false negatives and low false positive rate (0.64%), underscores the high accuracy (99.4%) of Cue POCT to provide rapid PCR quality results. Low error rates (cancellation rate of 0% and invalid rate of 0.63%) with the current software version were additionally noted. Together these findings highlight the value of accurate molecular COVID-19 POCT in a distributed service delivery model to rapidly detect cases in the community with the potential to curb transmission in high exposure settings (i.e. in-flight, congregate workplace and social events). The insights gleaned from this operational implementation are readily transferable to future POCT diagnostic services.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The data presented in this manuscript represent a prospective verification of test performance of the Cue COVID-19 Point of Care Testing system versus RT-PCR leveraging results gathered from provision of routine testing services. This study methodology was reviewed by Advarra Review Board and was considered to be exempted. They noted the framework of this comparison (where it was conducted, information provided to paying patrons, anonymized data analysis and report) fulfill the criteria for Exemption under the Common Rule (45 CFR subpart A).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 16, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model
Anu Rebbapragada, Lane Cariazo, David Elchuk, Hossam Abdelrahman, Dang Pham, Nirochile Joseph, Elena Gouzenkova, Harpreet Gill, Peter Blecher
medRxiv 2022.08.12.22278567; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.12.22278567
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model
Anu Rebbapragada, Lane Cariazo, David Elchuk, Hossam Abdelrahman, Dang Pham, Nirochile Joseph, Elena Gouzenkova, Harpreet Gill, Peter Blecher
medRxiv 2022.08.12.22278567; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.12.22278567

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (270)
  • Allergy and Immunology (552)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1760)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (659)
  • Epidemiology (10799)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (592)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2950)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1928)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (292)
  • HIV/AIDS (630)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12518)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (692)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2799)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1467)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (257)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (381)
  • Pediatrics (866)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (366)
  • Primary Care Research (337)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2640)
  • Public and Global Health (5370)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1013)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (596)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (279)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (125)