ABSTRACT
Objective Cellphone ubiquity has increased distracted pedestrian behavior and contributed to growing pedestrian injury rates. A major barrier to large-scale implementation of prevention programs is unavailable information on potential net monetary benefits. We evaluated net economic benefits of StreetBit, a program that reduces distracted pedestrian behavior by sending warnings from intersection-installed Bluetooth beacons to distracted pedestrians’ smartphones.
Methods Three data sources were used: (1) fatal, severe, non-severe pedestrian injury rates from Alabama’s electronic crash-reporting-system; (2) expected costs per fatal, severe, non-severe pedestrian injury – including medical cost, value of statistical life, work-loss cost, quality-of-life cost – from CDC; and (3) prevalence of distracted walking from extant literature. We computed and compared estimated monetary costs of distracted walking in Alabama and monetary benefits from implementing StreetBit to reduce pedestrian injuries at intersections.
Results Over 2019-2021, Alabama recorded an annual average of 31 fatal, 83 severe, and 115 non-severe pedestrian injuries in intersections. Expected costs/injury were $11 million, $339,535, and $93,877, respectively. The estimated range of distracted walking prevalence is 25%-40%, and StreetBit demonstrates 19.1% (95%CI: 1.6%-36.0%) reduction. These figures demonstrate potential annual cost savings from using interventions like StreetBit statewide ranging from $18.1-$29 million. Potential costs range from $3,208,600 (beacons at every-fourth urban intersection) to $6,359,200 (every other intersection).
Conclusions Even under the most parsimonious scenario (25% distracted pedestrians; densest beacon placement), StreetBit yields $11.8 million estimated net annual benefit. Existing data sources can be leveraged to predict net monetary benefits of distracted pedestrian interventions like StreetBit and facilitate large-scale intervention adoption.
What is already known in this topic Smartphone-related distraction is a likely contributing factor to the increasing rate of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in the US. However, interventions to reduce pedestrian distraction have not been widely adapted.
What this study adds One barrier to widespread adaption is lack of information on benefits versus costs. This study examines the economic costs and benefits of an intervention that reduces distracted walking to increase pedestrian safety, and provides a template showing how existing data sources can be leveraged to do similar analyses for other interventions designed to reduce pedestrian safety.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy The template developed in this study can facilitate large-scale implementation of any intervention designed to prevent pedestrian fatalities and injuries by providing policymakers information on net benefits of the intervention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Award Number 1952090 and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21HD095270
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email: jillur{at}uab.edu
Email: schwebel{at}uab.edu
Email: ragib{at}uab.edu
Email: russellg{at}uab.edu
Email: bsen{at}uab.edu
Data Availability
All data used in this manuscript are publicly available. the sources are described in the manuscript.
