Abstract
There is increasing expectation that advanced, computationally expensive machine learning techniques, when applied to large population-wide neuroimaging datasets, will help to uncover key differences in the human brain in health and disease. We take a comprehensive approach to explore how multiple aspects of brain structural connectivity can predict sex, age, general cognitive function and general psychopathology, testing different machine learning algorithms from deep learning model (BrainNetCNN) to classical machine learning methods. We modelled N = 8, 183 structural connectomes from UK Biobank using six different structural network weightings obtained from diffusion MRI. Streamline count generally provided highest prediction accuracies in all prediction tasks. Deep learning did not improve on prediction accuracies from simpler linear models. Further, high correlations between gradient attribution coefficients from deep learning and model coefficients from linear models suggested the models ranked the importance of features in similar ways, which indirectly suggested the similarity in models’ strategies for making predictive decision to some extent. This highlights that model complexity is unlikely to improve detection of associations between structural connectomes and complex phenotypes with the current sample size.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by Wellcome Trust awards (References 104036/Z/14/Z; 220857/Z/20/Z) This study was supported by Wellcome Trust awards (References 104036/Z/14/Z; 220857/Z/20/Z), and was also supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant R01AG054628 which supported CRB, EMT, MEB and SRC. The research was conducted using the UK Biobank resource, with approved project number 10279. Structural brain imaging data from UK Biobank was processed using facilities within the Lothian Birth Cohort group at the University of Edinburgh, which is supported by Age UK (as The Disconnected Mind project), the Medical Research Council (MR/R024065/1), and the University of Edinburgh. This work has made use of the resources provided by the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (ECDF). The Population Research Center (PRC) and Center on Aging and Population Sciences (CAPS) at The University of Texas at Austin are supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants P2CHD042849 and P30AG066614, respectively. KMS was supported by Health Data Research UK, an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation Councils, NIH Research (England) and the UK devolved administrations, and leading medical research charities. SRC was also supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (221890/Z/20/Z). AMM and HCW are additionally supported by a UKRI award (Reference MC\_PC\_17209).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank's Access Procedures stipulate that participant data can only be made available to approved researchers. Therefore, the data used in this study cannot be made available for public access.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* These authors share joint senior authorship
Supplemental files updated. Added limitations of the psychopathological factor. Clarified the choice of models.
Data Availability
The UK Biobank's Access Procedures stipulate that participant data can only be made available to approved researchers. Therefore, the data used in this study cannot be made available for public access.
