Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models

View ORCID ProfileJonathan H. Lu, View ORCID ProfileAlison Callahan, View ORCID ProfileBirju S. Patel, View ORCID ProfileKeith E. Morse, Dev Dash, View ORCID ProfileNigam H. Shah
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.21.21260282
Jonathan H. Lu
1Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan H. Lu
  • For correspondence: jhlu@stanford.edu
Alison Callahan
1Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alison Callahan
Birju S. Patel
1Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Birju S. Patel
Keith E. Morse
2Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
3Department of Clinical Informatics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Keith E. Morse
Dev Dash
1Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nigam H. Shah
1Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nigam H. Shah
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective To assess whether the documentation available for commonly used machine learning models developed by an electronic health record (EHR) vendor provides information requested by model reporting guidelines.

Materials and Methods We identified items requested for reporting from model reporting guidelines published in computer science, biomedical informatics, and clinical journals, and merged similar items into representative “atoms”. Four independent reviewers and one adjudicator assessed the degree to which model documentation for 12 models developed by Epic Systems reported the details requested in each atom. We present summary statistics of consensus, interrater agreement, and reporting rates of all atoms for the 12 models.

Results We identified 220 unique atoms across 15 model reporting guidelines. After examining the documentation for the 12 most commonly used Epic models, the independent reviewers had an interrater agreement of 76%. After adjudication, the model documentations’ median completion rate of applicable atoms was 39% (range: 31%-47%). Most of the commonly requested atoms had reporting rates of 90% or above, including atoms concerning outcome definition, preprocessing, AUROC, internal validation and intended clinical use. For individual reporting guidelines, the median adherence rate for an entire guideline was 54% (range: 15%-71%). Atoms reported half the time or less included those relating to fairness (summary statistics and subgroup analyses, including for age, race/ethnicity, or sex), usefulness (net benefit, prediction time, warnings on out-of-scope use and when to stop use), and transparency (model coefficients).

Atoms relating to reliability also had low reporting, including those related to missingness (missing data statistics, missingness strategy), validation (calibration plot, external validation), and monitoring (how models are updated/tuned, prediction monitoring).

Conclusion There are many recommendations about what should be reported about predictive models used to guide care. Existing model documentation examined in this study provides less than half of applicable atoms, and entire reporting guidelines have low adherence rates. Half or less of the reviewed documentation reported information related to usefulness, reliability, transparency and fairness of models. There is a need for better operationalization of reporting recommendations for predictive models in healthcare.

Question How often does documentation for commonly deployed clinical predictive models report the information requested by model reporting guidelines?

Finding Combining the recommendations from 15 model reporting guidelines, we identified 220 unique requested items. We reviewed the documentation of 12 commonly deployed Epic models and assessed the completion rate of applicable items. The median completion rate was 39%. While the most commonly requested items were highly reported, information on usefulness, reliability, transparency and fairness was missing from at least half of documentation.

Meaning There is incomplete documentation for model users to ensure that deployed models are useful, reliable, transparent and fair.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

JHL was funded by a Stanford University School of Medicine MedScholars grant. The study was supported by the Stanford Medicine Program for AI in Healthcare which is funded by a gift from Debra and Mark Leslie as well as the Department of Medicine and Stanford Healthcare.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data and code used for methods, including merging of guidelines, deduplication of atoms, mapping of atoms onto stages of model development and tasks, grading of Model Briefs, adjudication, and analysis are available at eFile 1.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 23, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models
Jonathan H. Lu, Alison Callahan, Birju S. Patel, Keith E. Morse, Dev Dash, Nigam H. Shah
medRxiv 2021.07.21.21260282; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.21.21260282
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models
Jonathan H. Lu, Alison Callahan, Birju S. Patel, Keith E. Morse, Dev Dash, Nigam H. Shah
medRxiv 2021.07.21.21260282; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.21.21260282

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1103)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (504)
  • Epidemiology (9787)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2323)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1566)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11658)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2149)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (339)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1184)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2192)
  • Public and Global Health (4676)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (211)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)