Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Validity of the Cold Pressor Test and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire via online self-administration

Matthew McIntyre, 23andMe Research Team, View ORCID ProfileAchim Kless, Peter Hein, Mark Field, Joyce Y Tung
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19011775
Matthew McIntyre
23andMe;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mmcintyre@23andme.com
-;
Achim Kless
Grunenthal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Achim Kless
  • For correspondence: kless@gmx.net
Peter Hein
Grunenthal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Field
Grunenthal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joyce Y Tung
23andMe;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joyce@23andme.com
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

To determine the feasibility of complex home-based phenotyping, 1,876 research participants from the customer base of 23andMe participated in an online version of a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) as well as a cold pressor test (CPT) which is used in clinical assessments of pain. Overall our online version of the PSQ performed similarly to the original pen-and-paper version. Construct validity of the PSQ total was demonstrated by internal consistency and consistent discrimination between more and less painful items. Criterion validity was demonstrated by correlation with pain sensitivity as measured by the cold pressor test. Within the same cohort we performed a cold pressor test using a layperson description and household equipment. Comparison with published reports from controlled studies revealed similar distributions of cold pain tolerance times (i.e., time elapsed before removing the hand from the water). Of those who elected to participate in the CPT, a large majority of participants did not report issues with the test procedure or noncompliance to the instructions (97%). We confirmed a large sex difference in CPT thresholds in line with published data, such that women removed their hands from the water at a median of 54.2 seconds, with men lasting for a median time of 82.7 seconds (Kruskal-Wallis statistic, p < 0.0001), but other factors like age or current pain treatment were at most weakly associated, and inconsistently between men and women. We introduce a new paradigm for performing pain testing, called testing@home, that, in the case of cold nociception, showed comparable results to studies conducted under controlled conditions and supervision of a health care professional.

Competing Interest Statement

This research was conducted by 23andMe and Grünenthal GmbH. All authors are employees of these companies.

Funding Statement

This research was conducted by 23andMe and Grünenthal GmbH.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data is contained in the manuscript and supplementary material

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 18, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validity of the Cold Pressor Test and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire via online self-administration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
Share
Validity of the Cold Pressor Test and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire via online self-administration
Matthew McIntyre, 23andMe Research Team, Achim Kless, Peter Hein, Mark Field, Joyce Y Tung
medRxiv 19011775; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19011775
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Validity of the Cold Pressor Test and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire via online self-administration
Matthew McIntyre, 23andMe Research Team, Achim Kless, Peter Hein, Mark Field, Joyce Y Tung
medRxiv 19011775; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19011775

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Pain Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (5)
  • Allergy and Immunology (5)
  • Anesthesia (5)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (36)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (1)
  • Dermatology (8)
  • Emergency Medicine (3)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (18)
  • Epidemiology (143)
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Gastroenterology (14)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (58)
  • Geriatric Medicine (8)
  • Health Economics (5)
  • Health Informatics (40)
  • Health Policy (13)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (9)
  • Hematology (3)
  • HIV/AIDS (26)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (52)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (5)
  • Medical Education (18)
  • Medical Ethics (3)
  • Nephrology (5)
  • Neurology (60)
  • Nursing (4)
  • Nutrition (12)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (6)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (11)
  • Oncology (35)
  • Ophthalmology (16)
  • Orthopedics (1)
  • Otolaryngology (6)
  • Pain Medicine (6)
  • Palliative Medicine (1)
  • Pathology (8)
  • Pediatrics (16)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (6)
  • Primary Care Research (7)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (70)
  • Public and Global Health (58)
  • Radiology and Imaging (20)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (18)
  • Respiratory Medicine (10)
  • Rheumatology (8)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (4)
  • Sports Medicine (7)
  • Surgery (7)
  • Toxicology
  • Transplantation (4)
  • Urology (1)