RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Validity of the Cold Pressor Test and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire via online self-administration JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 19011775 DO 10.1101/19011775 A1 Matthew H. McIntyre A1 23andMe Research Team A1 Achim Kless A1 Peter Hein A1 Mark Field A1 Joyce Y. Tung YR 2019 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/18/19011775.abstract AB To determine the feasibility of complex home-based phenotyping, 1,876 research participants from the customer base of 23andMe participated in an online version of a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) as well as a cold pressor test (CPT) which is used in clinical assessments of pain. Overall our online version of the PSQ performed similarly to the original pen-and-paper version. Construct validity of the PSQ total was demonstrated by internal consistency and consistent discrimination between more and less painful items. Criterion validity was demonstrated by correlation with pain sensitivity as measured by the cold pressor test. Within the same cohort we performed a cold pressor test using a layperson description and household equipment. Comparison with published reports from controlled studies revealed similar distributions of cold pain tolerance times (i.e., time elapsed before removing the hand from the water). Of those who elected to participate in the CPT, a large majority of participants did not report issues with the test procedure or noncompliance to the instructions (97%). We confirmed a large sex difference in CPT thresholds in line with published data, such that women removed their hands from the water at a median of 54.2 seconds, with men lasting for a median time of 82.7 seconds (Kruskal-Wallis statistic, p < 0.0001), but other factors like age or current pain treatment were at most weakly associated, and inconsistently between men and women. We introduce a new paradigm for performing pain testing, called testing@home, that, in the case of cold nociception, showed comparable results to studies conducted under controlled conditions and supervision of a health care professional.Summary Research paradigms employing home-based phenotyping are feasible, with both questionnaires and self-administration of a well-established experimental human pain model yielding similar results compared to controlled settings.Competing Interest StatementThis research was conducted by 23andMe and GrĂ¼nenthal GmbH. All authors are employees of these companies.Funding StatementThis research was conducted by 23andMe and GrĂ¼nenthal GmbH.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is contained in the manuscript and supplementary material