Abstract
Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic or adverse events in early life that can have lasting effects on behavioral, emotional, and psychological functioning. Prior research suggests ACEs relate to later psychiatric outcomes through threshold, cumulative, and individual-specific risk patterns. Few studies, however, have operationalized all three models to test ACE-specific associations with diagnosed psychiatric disorders in individuals who are adopted or with foster care histories. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study using electronic health record data from foster care and adopted patients aged 0-21 years old seen at the University of Minnesota Adoption Medicine Clinic (UMN-AMC) between 2014-2024. Extracted measures included ACE history, demographics, and psychiatric diagnoses. We used latent class analysis and logistic regression to identify clusters of adversity and estimate associations with psychiatric diagnosis domains, adjusting for Sex and Age at Initial Visit. Results: ACEs showed a threshold pattern across psychiatric domains, with higher ACE counts associated with greater odds of psychiatric diagnoses. Individual risk modeling indicated that exposure to abuse or violence was associated with higher odds of psychiatric diagnoses. Across cumulative and individual risk approaches, Anxiety Disorders, Mood Disorders, and Behavioral or Emotional Disorders showed the greatest sensitivity to adversity. Conclusion: Current ACE models may not fully capture neurodevelopmental impacts reflected in diagnosed psychiatric disorders among adolescents, particularly in high-risk groups such as foster and adopted individuals. In a large clinic sample our findings support a nuanced association between ACEs and later psychiatric diagnoses and highlight the need for ACE-focused assessment, prevention, and treatment strategies tailored to foster care and adopted populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of the University of Minnesota gave ethical approval of this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://conservancy.umn.edu/browse/author?value=Randolph,%20Anita&bbm.return=1
https://conservancy.umn.edu/browse/author?value=Randolph,%20Anita&bbm.return=1
Funder Information Declared
