Abstract
Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients are characterized by an early decline of episodic memory due to hippocampal damage. Nonetheless, besides the classical negative symptoms related to episodic memory deficits, i.e. failure to retrieve information, it has been shown that AD patients can also suffer from positives symptoms, i.e. confabulations. Some theoretical accounts have been proposed to explain the cognitive mechanisms underlying confabulation. Yet, even if most of these models have lead to some research trying to validate cognitive deficits in some cognitive domains, in particular executive functions, to our knowledge, none has yet tried to determine the specific cognitive profile of confabulatory patients. In the present study the main aim is to characterize the specific cognitive profile of confabulatory patients. Thus, given that AD patients’ cognitive profile is well known and documented, we compare mild to moderate AD patients with and without confabulations.
Methods 37 healthy control (HC) and 35 individuals with mild to moderate AD were recruited at the Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital. All participants were evaluated on Dalla Barba’s Confabulation Battery to determine their tendency to produce provoked confabulations. Thus, among AD patients, we distinguish between those who produced confabulations in episodic memory questions, and those who did not. Accordingly 27 AD patients were considered free of confabulations (ADC-), and 8 as confabulators (ADC+) (none HC met the criteria). All participants were assessed on a comprehensive neuropsychological battery.
Results Statistical analyses showed a significant difference between HC participants and the two groups of AD patients, in almost all cognitive domains assessed. However, when comparing the two AD groups, they did not show distinct profiles. Moreover, regarding the type of confabulations, ADC+ produced significantly more confabulations to the Episodic questions (both concerning past and future).
Conclusions By not demonstrating cognitive differences between patients with and without confabulations, our results cast doubts on some confabulation models, which assume a unique and sufficient cognitive (e.g. executive) deficit underlying the onset of confabulations.
Highlights
Alzheimer’s disease patients with or without confabulations do not have otherwise distinct cognitive profiles.
The emergence of a confabulatory syndrome does not seem to be the result of a necessary and sufficient executive deficit
Alzheimer’s disease patients mainly produce episodic memory confabulations, which involve both the past and the future dimension.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Pitie Salpetriere Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email addresses: gagliardi.geoffroy{at}gmail.com (Geoffroy Gagliardi), valentina.lacorte{at}gmail.com (Valentina La Corte1), marion.houot{at}yahoo.fr (Marion Houot), bruno.dubois{at}aphp.fr (Bruno Dubois), gdallabarba{at}me.com (Gianfranco Dalla Barba1)
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
