Abstract
Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy, yet uptake remains suboptimal and ensuring access to PrEP services among young people is critical. We explored the barriers and facilitators associated with accessing PrEP among young people
Methods Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in April and May 2023 in the City of Johannesburg district in South Africa. Participants were adult males and females (ages 18-35) self-reporting as HIV negative with or without previous PrEP use and exposure. We analysed transcripts using a deductive and inductive thematic approach. Two transcripts were coded by three coders to test reliability and saturation was reached when no new themes emerged.
Results Findings were mapped to the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM). Key barriers emerged across levels. Individual level barriers included difficulty adhering to daily oral PrEP and fear of needles. Interpersonal challenges included anxiety about disclosing PrEP use to partners or family. Institutional and organisational barriers involved long clinic queues, negative staff attitudes, limited confidentiality and inadequate PrEP information. At the community level, stigma and misconceptions linking PrEP to HIV treatment deterred uptake. Several facilitators emerged. Individual motivation to remain HIV negative was a strong driver of uptake. Supportive relationships and open communication with friends and family enhanced acceptance. Organisational enablers included access to clear information, youth-friendly services, competent providers and delivery options such as home delivery or pharmacy access. Community awareness initiatives reduced stigma and structural support in a form of free PrEP improved affordability and access.
Conclusion Young people’s access to PrEP is shaped by interactions across individual, relational, institutional, community, and structural levels. Tailored interventions that address personal barriers, strengthen supportive environments, improve service delivery, and ensure affordability are likely to strengthen uptake and adherence. These findings highlight the need for multilevel strategies to optimize PrEP implementation among youth.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Gates Foundation (INV-039268). LL was partially supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under grant number K01MH119923. The contents herein are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Gates Foundation or the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in compliance with regulatory requirements and ethical guidelines for research with human subjects in South Africa and institutional policies (ICH Good Clinical Practice). Ethical oversight was provided by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand (211122), South African National Clinical Trials Registry, registration number: DOH-27-032022-5627 and the Gauteng Department of Health (GP_202201_028)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
List of abbreviations
- B-Hub
- Behavioural Hub
- FGD
- Focus Group Discussions
- GHSS
- Global Health Sector Strategy
- GP
- Gauteng Province
- HE²RO
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office
- HIV
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- PLWH
- People Living With HIV
- PrEP
- Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
- SA
- South Africa
- SRH
- Sexual Reproductive Health
- SAA
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- UN-SDGs-3
- United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3
- WHO
- World Health Organization
- SEM
- Social-Ecological Models





