Abstract
Background Accurate early prediction of neurological outcomes in comatose patients after cardiac arrest is critical for guiding therapeutic decisions and improving individualized care. Current electroencephalographic (EEG) approaches typically rely on threshold-based or binarized measures of functional connectivity, which may overlook key subtleties of brain dynamics and limit clinical interpretability. We aimed to develop an explainable machine learning framework using weighted EEG connectivity and topological network features to improve early outcome prediction after cardiac arrest.
Methods and Findings We analyzed EEG recordings from comatose patients within the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest, recruited from multiple intensive care units across Switzerland. Weighted functional connectivity networks were computed using the debiased weighted phase-lag index (dwPLI) across 1–40 Hz. We extracted multi-frequency topological metrics describing global integration and local segregation, and used these as features in an explainable machine learning classifier to predict long-term neurological outcome. Model interpretation was performed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The classifier achieved up to 95% accuracy in distinguishing patients with favourable versus unfavourable outcomes, matching or surpassing existing approaches. SHAP analyses identified delta-band features, particularly path length and clustering coefficient, as the most informative predictors, highlighting differences in large-scale integration and local segregation between outcome groups. Main limitations include the moderate cohort size and the dependency on expert-guided artefact rejection during EEG preprocessing.
Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that weighted network topology and multifrequency EEG analysis provide valuable, interpretable biomarkers of coma outcome. The proposed explainable AI framework offers a transparent, quantitative, and clinically meaningful approach for early neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest and may inform the design of future decision-support tools in critical care neurology.
Author summary After a cardiac arrest, many patients remain unconscious in intensive care. Families and clinicians face difficult decisions, yet early and reliable signs of recovery are scarce. In this study, we analyze routine bedside EEG recordings by viewing the brain as a network. We do not study individual connections. Instead, we transform the data into network topological features, simple summary measures of the network’s overall shape and organization. Using these features across a range of slower and faster brain rhythms, we train a transparent prediction model to estimate each patient’s chance of regaining consciousness. For each patient, the model indicates which network features and which rhythm ranges most influenced its estimate, in clear figures that clinicians can examine. We find that these network summaries add useful information to current bedside assessments and may help structure earlier, more consistent conversations about prognosis. We present a step-by-step analysis designed with clinical workflows in mind. Our goal is to support, not replace, medical judgment, and to help build explainable tools for disorders of consciousness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the European Research Council under Grant CoG 2015-682172NETS to S.C.O, within the Seventh European Union Framework Program, the Swiss NSF (grant 32003B_212981) to M.D.L and the Eurostars project E!3489 to M.D.L.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Patients were recruited from multiple intensive care units across Switzerland, such as the University Hospitals of Lausanne (n = 69), Sion (n = 4), Fribourg (n = 2) and Bern (n = 63) between July 2014 and January 2018. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the respective institutions (Commission cantonale d'Ethique de la recherche sur l'Etre humain du Canton de Vaud, CER-VD, approval PB_2016-00530, 23/05). Informed consent was obtained for all patients in accordance with the ethical approval.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
† Deceased
¶ Membership list can be found in the Acknowledgments section.
Data availability
The data included in this study are not publicly available due to the sensitive nature of the clinical EEG recordings and restrictions imposed by Swiss ethical and legal frameworks. According to the ethics approval (PB 2016-00530, CER-VD, 23/05), these data cannot be shared outside the approved research consortium. For more information about the ethical framework governing these data, please contact the Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche sur l’être humain du Canton de Vaud (CER-VD, info.cer{at}vd.ch), which oversees research ethics and compliance for this cohort but does not distribute or authorize data access. The analysis code used for data processing and model training is available from the authors upon reasonable request.





