Abstract
Purpose To increase diagnostic yield from genomic testing, it is essential to improve the use of experimental data as functional evidence in variant classification. Recent work suggests building confidence of those performing functional data evaluation may improve their capability to use functional evidence. We present a solution to develop confidence and build capability while supporting practice development, through workshop-based community discussion and consultation.
Methods A series of workshops were delivered, each with learning content centred on current expert recommendations while surveying participants in their experimental evaluation practice and opinions around evaluating experimental data.
Results Workshop participants were highly engaged and indicated a desire for further training and resources. Consultation suggested that ambiguity in the current recommendations underpinned differences in interpretation and ultimately resulted in practice variation. Collaborative, case-based discussion was identified as the overall preferred method of building confidence, so we propose this as an approach to field-based capability development. We delivered case-based community discussion, after which participants reported improved comfort in the evaluation practice.
Conclusion Through the consultative workshop approach, workshop participants have built confidence but also contributed to developing field recommendations. Therefore, we recommend this approach as a means to capability development for evolving fields.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Australian Government Australian Department of Health MRFF APP2015946.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Resarch Ethics Committee/IRB of QIMR Berghofer gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript or are available online at https://zenodo.org/communities/ausmave
