Abstract
This study focuses on the approbation of the Keen Eye method for diagnosing visual neglect. A total of 102 patients with right hemisphere damage participated in the study, 38 of whom were diagnosed with neglect. The primary goal was to assess the effectiveness of Keen Eye in comparison with traditional paper-based tests. Keen Eye is based on a dual-task paradigm, integrating target identification and visual stimulus localization tasks, with stimuli presented in different areas of the screen. The results demonstrated the high diagnostic accuracy of the method, enabling the detection of covert forms of neglect. The study showed that the method allows for the assessment of both horizontal and vertical neglect severity and the identification of patients with neglect combined with non-lateralized attention deficits. The method exhibited high criterion and construct convergent validity and holds significant potential for clinical application.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the research project 075-15-2024-526. Funder Website: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru Maria S. Kovyazina, Georgy K. Stepanov, Daria D. Terentiy, Victoria A. Propustina, Anatoly A. Skvortsov, Nataliya A. Varako, Svetlana A. Vasilyeva, Yuri P. Zinchenko were supported by this funding. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Ethics Committee of the Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
