Abstract
Background Fractures are among the most common traumatic injuries worldwide, with distal radius fractures and femoral neck fractures being particularly prevalent[1,2]. These fractures not only affect patients’ quality of life but also impose a significant economic burden. Although there is extensive research on distal radius fractures and femoral neck fractures individually, comparative studies between the two are relatively scarce. Therefore, we analyzed clinical data from patients with distal radius fractures and femoral neck fractures treated at our hospital to explore the differences between these two types of fractures.
Methods and findings This retrospective study included patients treated for distal radius fractures and femoral neck fractures at our hospital from January 2020 to February 2025. Data collected included gender, age, length of hospital stay, treatment methods, preoperative preparation time, and total hospitalization costs. Statistical analysis was performed on all data to analyze the characteristics of patients with distal radius fractures and femoral neck fractures.
During the study period, 204 patients with distal radius fractures and 124 patients with femoral neck fractures were included. Among distal radius fracture patients, 50% were male and 50% were female, with no statistically significant gender difference. Among femoral neck fracture patients, 45.16% were male and 54.84% were female, also with no statistically significant gender difference. The average age of distal radius fracture patients was 48.49 ± 14.51 years, while that of femoral neck fracture patients was 62.80 ± 17.64 years, showing a statistically significant difference. The average length of hospital stay for distal radius fracture patients was 8.31 ± 5.24 days, compared to 12.60 ± 6.96 days for femoral neck fracture patients, also statistically significant. Surgical treatment was performed in 80.88% of distal radius fracture patients and 80.65% of femoral neck fracture patients, with no statistically significant difference. The preoperative preparation time was 4.25 ± 2.55 days for distal radius fracture patients and 5.30 ± 3.31 days for femoral neck fracture patients, showing a statistically significant difference. The total hospitalization cost was 22,200.56 ± 13,295.27 yuan for distal radius fracture patients and 39,334.46 ± 27,283.70 yuan for femoral neck fracture patients, with a statistically significant difference.
Conclusion This study revealed significant differences in clinical characteristics between patients with distal radius fractures and femoral neck fractures, particularly in age, length of hospital stay, preoperative preparation time, and hospitalization costs. Femoral neck fractures were more common in elderly patients, with longer preoperative preparation times, longer hospital stays, and higher treatment costs. In contrast, distal radius fracture patients were younger, with shorter preoperative preparation times, shorter hospital stays, and lower treatment costs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Shenzhen Clinical Medical Research Center for Trauma Treatment Fund [LCYSSQ20220823091405012].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Third People's Hospital.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study is a review article and does not contain any original research data.
