Abstract
Social isolation is a growing public health concern, particularly among cancer survivors who face persistent challenges in maintaining social connections following treatment. While its impact on mental health is increasingly recognized, the underlying pathways and contextual differences across rural and urban settings remain underexplored. This study aimed to identify the psychosocial and personal factors that contribute to perceived social isolation among U.S. cancer survivors and to assess how isolation mediates the relationship between these factors and mental health. We also examined whether these associations differ between rural and urban populations. Data were drawn from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6), with a subsample of cancer survivors (n = 926). A conceptual framework was developed using constructs from the Biopsychosocial Model, the Stress Process Model, the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, and the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to evaluate the relationships among personal factors (age, BMI, time since diagnosis, inability of self-care), psychosocial perceptions (perceived care quality, cancer information comprehension, negative life perception), social isolation, and mental health (PHQ-4). Multigroup analysis compared rural and urban survivors. Social isolation was a strong predictor of mental health, with key antecedents including cancer information access, inability of self-care, time since diagnosis, negative life perception, and perception of care quality. Several pathways varied by geography; for instance, the effects of self-care difficulty and care perception on isolation and mental health were significant only in urban settings. This study highlights the central role of social isolation in shaping mental health outcomes among cancer survivors and underscores the importance of targeted, context-sensitive interventions to reduce isolation and promote psychosocial well-being, particularly in underserved rural communities.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A. It is a secondary data analysis of a public dataset
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
avishek.choudhury{at}mail.wvu.edu, chris.wheldon{at}temple.edu, selkefi{at}mtu.edu, priyanka.dixit{at}tiss.edu.in
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study is available from HINTS at https://hints.cancer.gov/data/download-data.aspx.
