ABSTRACT
Background Creation of resources for evidence-based clinical guidance does not necessarily improve patient outcomes without deliberate dissemination and implementation. We sought to better understand the effectiveness of pre-recorded didactics in improving knowledge as well as the reach of various information dissemination strategies.
Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted amongst all United States’ trauma care clinicians from March to August 2023. A 30-minute didactic video on anticoagulant management in geriatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), along with pre-and post-video knowledge surveys, was circulated via email, web, and social media accounts affiliated with 7 professional trauma societies as well as state and regional health departments. Digital analytics were captured, and descriptive and regression analyses conducted.
Results The didactic video was viewed 1,407 times on YouTube with a mean view time of 7 minutes. A total of 311 participants responded to the survey. Most were registered nurses (RNs) from urban, non-academic institutions with 11+ years of clinical experience. Only 16.1% of respondents correctly answered all pre-video knowledge questions (n=48/298); this increased to 51.6% post-video (n=94/182). Surgeons and advanced practice providers (APPs) (r=0.148, p<0.05), male respondents (r=0.131, p<0.05), and clinicians at higher-level trauma centers (r=-0.140, p<0.05) answered more pre-video questions correctly. With regard to general knowledge acquisition practices, surgeons and APPs were more likely than RNs to report primary use of literature (r=0.134, p<0.05) and point-of-care medical information (r=0.133, p<0.05).
Conclusion Viewing a recorded didactic was associated with improved knowledge of anticoagulation management in geriatric TBI. Trauma society-sponsored email is an effective means of information dissemination to urban, Level I/II trauma centers, but still fails to reach many rural and Level III/IV trauma centers. Given the low rate of correct pre-video answers and increase after viewing, further study is needed to better understand end-user needs to optimize dissemination and implementation of up-to-date clinical guidance.
Level of Evidence Level IV; Survey and Web Analytics
Competing Interest Statement
ANM reports financial support from The ReSource, LLC for project coordination. MJK reports consulting fees from Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Novo Nordisk, and Endocrine & Diabetes Plus Clinic of Houston. TB reports grants from K23 NIA and Harold Amos Medical Fellowship, RWJ. IB is employed by VML and completed this work as part of their employment (VML was not paid for this work). BJ reports support from Department of Defense (DoD) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants. BJ also discloses payment and support from CSL Behring. BJ holds leadership positions on the Editorial Boards of various journals (Current Trauma Reports, Annals of Surgery Open Access, World Journal of Surgery, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery), on the Coalition for National Trauma Research Scientific Advisory Committee and is the Director for the EAST Manuscript & Literature Review Committee. DMS reports ongoing support from PCORI, NIH, DoD, and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) grants. DMS also discloses payment from CSL Behring. DMS holds leadership positions: Program Committee member and Algorithm Chair for the Western Trauma Association; Board of Directors and Deputy Editor for the Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery; Chair for the Trauma, Burns, and Surgical Critical Care Board of the American Board of Surgery; and Geriatric Content Lead, American College of Surgeons Advanced Life Support (ATLS) 11th Edition.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, CB F490 of Medical Center of the Rockies, University of Colorado Health waived ethical approval for this work (i.e., determined this mixed-methods study was determined exempt from IRB review; COMIRB#: 22-0209).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All de-identified data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
