Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain disproportionately low among Hispanic and Latino populations compared to non-Hispanic whites. While artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in healthcare delivery, concerns exist that AI-based interventions may disadvantage non-English-speaking populations due to biases in development and deployment.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a bilingual AI care agent in engaging Spanish-speaking patients for CRC screening compared to English-speaking patients.
Methods This retrospective analysis examined an AI-powered outreach initiative at WellSpan Health in Pennsylvania and Maryland during September 2024. The study included 1,878 patients (517 Spanish-speaking, 1,361 English-speaking) eligible for CRC screening who lacked active online health profiles. A bilingual AI conversational agent conducted personalized telephone calls in the patient’s preferred language to provide education about CRC screening and facilitate fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit requests. Primary outcome was FIT test opt-in rate, with secondary outcomes including connect rates and call duration. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results Spanish-speaking patients demonstrated significantly higher engagement across all measures compared to English-speaking patients: FIT test opt-in rates (18.2% vs. 7.1%, p<0.001), connect rates (69.6% vs. 53.0%, p<0.001), and call duration (6.05 vs. 4.03 minutes, p<0.001). Demographically, Spanish-speaking patients were younger (mean age 57 vs. 61 years, p<0.001) and more likely to be female (49.1% vs. 38.4%, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, Spanish language preference remained an independent predictor of FIT test opt-in (adjusted OR 2.012, 95% CI 1.340-3.019, p<0.001) after controlling for demographic factors and call duration.
Conclusions AI-powered outreach achieved significantly higher engagement among Spanish-speaking patients, challenging the assumption that technological interventions inherently disadvantage non-English speaking populations. The 2.6-fold higher FIT test opt-in rate among Spanish-speaking patients represents a notable departure from historical patterns of healthcare disparities. These findings suggest that language-concordant AI interactions may help address longstanding disparities in preventive care access. Study limitations include its single healthcare system setting, short duration, and lack of follow-up data on completed screenings. Future research should assess long-term adherence and whether higher engagement translates to improved clinical outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
MB, MSA, GM, RL, MRD, AM, SM, SG and AC are employees of Hippocratic AI, which provided funding for this study. RHB is an employee of WellSpan, which provided data for this study. JDA is an Adjunct Professor at the University of British Columbia and received compensation for work performed on this project. AA is an employee of UC Davis Health and received compensation for work performed on this project. All authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript and materials included in this submission.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by Hippocratic AI, Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
More accurate data on call connect rates in English and Spanish Speaking populations.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the results can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.
