Abstract
Precise movement requires integrating descending motor control with sensory feedback. Sensory networks interact strongly with descending motor circuits within the spinal cord. We targeted this interaction by pairing stimulation of the motor cortex with coordinated stimulation of the cervical spinal cord. We used separate non-invasive and epidural experiments to test the hypothesis that the strongest muscle response would occur when paired brain and spinal cord stimuli simultaneously converge within the spinal cord. For non-invasive experiments, we measured arm and hand muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) in 16 individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and 15 uninjured individuals. We compared this noninvasive approach to intraoperative paired stimulation experiments using dorsal epidural electrodes in 38 individuals undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy. We observed augmented muscle responses to suprathreshold TMS when subthreshold TSCS stimuli were timed to converge synchronously in the spinal cord. At convergent timing, target muscle MEPs increased by 11.0% overall (13.3% in people with SCI, 6.2% in uninjured individuals) compared to non-convergent time intervals. Facilitation correlated with TSCS intensity, with intensity close to movement threshold being most effective. Facilitation did not correlate with SCI level or severity, indicating spared circuits were sufficient for this effect. Noninvasive pairing produced less facilitation compared to intraoperative (epidural) pairing. Thus, sensorimotor interactions in the cervical spinal spinal cord can be targeted with paired stimulation in health and after SCI.
Highlights
Electrical stimulation of spinal sensory circuits can augment cortical motor evoked potentials, but only when they are timed to arrive synchronously in the spinal cord.
Facilitation was at least as large in people with spinal cord injury compared with uninjured controls, suggesting that the necessary circuits for this facilitation were spared by injury.
The magnitude of facilitation with noninvasive facilitation was smaller than the facilitation effect observed with epidural stimulation during elective spinal surgery, but they both rely on precisely timed interactions.
Facilitation of hand and arm muscle responses correlated with the transcutaneous spinal stimulation intensity, suggesting that the magnitude of the pairing effect can be improved.
Pairing was effective both in uninjured participants and those with SCI, independently of injury level, severity, or chronicity.
Competing Interest Statement
Jason B. Carmel is a Founder and stockholder in BackStop Neural and a scientific advisor and stockholder in SharperSense; he has received honoraria from Pacira, Motric Bio, and Restorative Therapeutics. Michael S. Virk has been a consultant and has received honoraria from Depuy Synthes, and stockholder with OnPoint Surgical. Noam Y. Harel is a consultant for RubiconMD. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Clinical Trial
NCT05163639
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (1R01NS124224); the New York State Department of Health (N.Y.H. Investigator Initiated); and the Travis Roy Foundation Boston, MA (J.B.C. Investigator Initiated).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center (JJP VAMC); Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM-IRB, 1806019336); and Columbia University Irving Medical Center (IRB 2, protocol AAAT6563). The study was pre-registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05163639). Written informed consent was obtained prior to study enrollment, and experimental procedures were conducted in compliance with institutional and governmental regulations guiding ethical principles for the participation of human volunteers.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Noam Y. Harel, MD, PhD Spinal Cord Damage Research Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, 130 W. Kingsbridge Road, 7A-13, Bronx, NY, USA 10468 E-mail: Noam.Harel{at}va.gov
Abbreviations: ADM, abductor digiti minimi; AIS, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; AUC, area under the curve; BB, biceps brachii; CMA, cervicomental angle; CMCT, central motor conduction time; ECR, extensor carpi radialis longus; EMG, electromyographic activity; FCR, flexor carpi radialis; FDI, first dorsal interosseous; HDI, highest density interval; ISI, interstimulus interval; MEP, motor evoked potential; MMT, manual muscle testing; MSO, maximal stimulator output ; PAS, paired associative stimulation; PI, pairing interval; PMCT, peripheral motor conduction time; SCAP, spinal cord associative plasticity; SCI, spinal cord injury; SCS, spinal cord stimulation; SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of the mean; TA, tibialis anterior; TB, triceps brachii; TES, transcranial electrical stimulation; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation; TSCS, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
Funding acknowledgments updated to include salary support from New York State Department of Health.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during this study are available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15225065.
