Abstract
Up to 98% of adult voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) clients heal without adverse events (AEs) in South Africa and in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region, yet all clients in South Africa (SA) are still required to attend in-person reviews, creating added work for providers and barriers for clients. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) using our fee-free, open-source, two-way texting (2wT) approach showed that males could independently monitor their healing with support from VMMC nurse-led telehealth and that 2wT was more cost-effective than routine visits for quality post-operative monitoring. The objectives of this costing activity were to assess the additive cost of 2wT vs. SoC during a stepped wedge design (SWD) expansion trial; costing an augmentation of 2wT with dedicated personnel during peak VMMC periods; and estimate the cost savings of 2wT from the payer perspective if scaled in routine VMMC settings. Data was collected from routine financial reports and complemented by previous RCT time-motion estimates. We conducted activity-based costing of SWD and peak season periods; sensitivity analysis estimated 2wT costs at scale. We included data from 6,842 males, with 2,586 (38%) opting for 2wT. 2wT participants attended an average of zero visits; SoC males had an average of 2 visits. Under 2wT, quality care markers improved and AE ascertainment increased while loss to follow-up (LTFU) decreased. Given a VMMC population of 10,000 adults, scenario analysis suggests that: 1) 2wT becomes cost neutral with 45% 2wT enrollment; 2) 2wT saves $0.29/client with 60% 2wT enrollment; and 3) 2wT saves $0.46/client with 80% 2wT enrollment. When implemented at scale, 2wT appears to significantly reduce costs to the healthcare system while improving the quality of post-operative care and requiring no additional client costs. 2wT should be expanded for eligible males across VMMC and other post-operative contexts in South Africa.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) of the National Institutes of Health under award number 5R01NR019229, ‘Expanding and Scaling Two-way Texting to Reduce Unnecessary Follow-Up and Improve Adverse Event Identification Among Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Clients in the Republic of South Africa.’ Statistical support was provided by the University of Washington and its Fred Hutch Center for AIDS Research, a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded program under award number AI027757 that is supported by the following NIH Institutes and Centers: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Investigation Agency, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol for the scale-up of 2wT as part of the SWD was approved by the review boards of the University of Washington (Study 00009703 PI Feldacker) and the University of Witwatersrand, Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 200204 PI Setswe). No informed consent was undertaken for this follow-up approach as 2wT was implemented as part of routine VMMC procedures for males ages 15 and older.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data for the study is provided in supplementary information (Table 1)
