ABSTRACT
Rationale Supplemental oxygen is often prescribed to patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The specific costs of oxygen therapy in these diseases have not been fully described in patients living in the United States.
Objectives Estimate Medicaid/Medicare costs for supplemental oxygen, characterize differences in oxygen equipment utilization, and identify factors impacting the costs of supplemental oxygen therapy in ILD and COPD.
Methods We reviewed claims data for years 2016-2020 for Pennsylvania residents with ILD or COPD who were dually eligible for Medicaid/Medicare and enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicare. A generalized estimated equation (GEE) model was used to identify variables associated with annual oxygen costs.
Measurements and Main Results A greater proportion of paid claims in ILD were for oxygen services (40.3% vs 22.0%) and for high flow oxygen (4.2% vs 2.2%), though ILD represented the minority of paid oxygen claims (5.2%). Oxygen cost approximately $65/month for both groups. Most oxygen claims (≥94%) were for stationary concentrators. Liquid devices and stationary gas were the least utilized equipment. Lower costs were associated with living in a competitive bidding area and with markers of advanced age and worse health status.
Conclusions Oxygen utilization is greater in ILD but is only a small portion of total oxygen claims compared to COPD. Costs and equipment utilization were similar between groups. Liquid oxygen claims were rare even among subjects requiring high flow. Oxygen therapy is common in these diseases and likely represents a significant contribution to total healthcare costs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Pittsburgh This study was determined to be exempt from human subjects research by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pittsburgh.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
SOURCES OF SUPPORT: None
Data Availability
Data used in this study cannot be made available due to agreements with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.