Abstract
Background Academic bullying among junior doctors—characterized by repeated actions that undermine confidence, reputation, and career progression—is associated with adverse consequences for mental health and professional development. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and determinants of academic bullying among junior doctors in Sierra Leone.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 126 junior doctors at the University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex (USLTHC) in Freetown between January 1 and March 30, 2024. Participants were selected through random sampling. Data were collected using a semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire and analyzed with descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression.
Results Of the 126 participants (61.1% male; mean age 31.9 years), 86 (68.3%) reported experiencing academic bullying. Among those, 54.6% experienced it occasionally and 35.2% very frequently. The most common forms were unfair criticism (73.3%), verbal aggression (66.3%), and derogatory remarks (47.7%). Consultants and senior doctors were the main perpetrators, with incidents primarily occurring during ward rounds, clinical meetings, and academic seminars. No statistically significant predictors of bullying were found for gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.07, 95% CI 0.92–4.64; p=0.08) or less than two years of practice (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.05–1.79; p=0.19).
Conclusion Academic bullying is pervasive among junior doctors at USLTHC, with significant implications for their mental health and professional development. Urgent implementation of comprehensive strategies—including culturally sensitive policies, targeted training programs, confidential reporting mechanisms, and leadership development—is essential to address this issue. Promoting ethical leadership and fostering a culture of respect may mitigate incivility and burnout, enhancing the work environment for junior doctors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study received ethical approval from the College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB review number: COMAHS/IRB/013-2024).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, Dr. Mohamed B. Jalloh (jallom1{at}mcmaster.ca). All authors recognise the value of sharing individual level data. We aim to ensure that data generated from all our research are collected, curated, managed and shared in a way that maximises their benefit.
