Abstract
Access to and delivery of quality surgical epilepsy care remains a challenge in both safety-net and private hospital systems. Underserved populations are more likely to utilize safety-net hospital systems, but there are few data on epilepsy surgery outcomes in this setting. We aimed to analyze and compare surgical epilepsy care in a safety-net versus private hospital system. We prospectively collected evaluation and treatment data in patients undergoing resective surgery for epilepsy at a safety-net hospital system and a collaborating private hospital system between 2010-2017. Seizure characteristics, pre-surgical evaluation, perioperative complications, and seizure outcomes were prospectively recorded. Data from 102 patients in the safety-net and 145 patients in the private hospital system were analyzed. There were higher proportions of African American (p=.02) and Hispanic patients (p= .03) in the safety-net hospital system. There was no difference in mean time from epilepsy onset to surgery between groups (p=.54). The presurgical evaluation was equivalent (p>.18), except for more frequent use of magnetoencephalography in the private system (p=.02). Seizure freedom outcomes were excellent, and complication rates were low with no significant differences between groups (p=.95 and p>.22, respectively). However, patients from safety-net hospital systems were more likely to be lost to follow up (p=.04). Quality and equitable surgical epilepsy care can be delivered in a safety-net hospital system despite the higher-minority demographics and intrinsic factors of safety-net hospitals. Partnership of safety-net hospital systems with established comprehensive epilepsy centers and the expansion of these services is essential for healthcare equity in modern epilepsy care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional review board approval was obtained from the Rancho Research Institute and the University of Southern California.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study area are not shared.
