Abstract
Background Despite the implementation of different control interventions, infections in the communities (among asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals) still play a crucial role in sustaining malaria transmission. This study evaluated the performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), microscopy, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) in detecting malaria parasites among community members in five villages of Kyerwa district, Kagera region, an area where artemisinin partial resistance (ART-R) has been recently confirmed.
Methods A community cross-sectional survey of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants (n=4454) aged ≥6 months was conducted in July and August 2023. Malaria infections were detected using RDTs, microscopy, and qPCR (using 18S RNA gene). Performance of RDTs and microscopy was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, using qPCR as the reference method. Factors affecting the accuracy of these methods were explored using a multivariate logistic regression model.
Results The prevalence of malaria infections was 44.4% (n = 1979/4454), 32.1% (n = 1431/4454), and 39.8% (n = 1771/4454) by RDTs, microscopy, and qPCR, respectively. The prevalence of P. malariae and P. ovale mono-infection by microscopy was 0.2% (n = 7/4454) and 0.3% (n = 12/4454), while by qPCR was 0.4% (n = 16/4454) and 0.5% (n = 24/4454), respectively. The geometric mean parasite densities (GMPDs) by microscopy were 642 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 570 - 723), 126 (95% CI = 98 - 162), and 124 (95% CI = 82 - 160) asexual parasites/µL; while by qPCR, the GMPDs were 1180 (95% CI = 1032 - 1349), 44 (95% CI = 32 - 61), and 50 (95% CI = 29 - 89) parasites/µL for P. falciparum, P. ovale spp, and P. malariae, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of RDTs were 94.0% (95% CI = 92.8% - 95.1%) and 87.5% (95% CI = 86.2% - 88.7%), respectively; whereas those of microscopy were 74.6% (95% CI = 72.5% - 76.6%) and 95.2% (95% CI = 94.3% - 96.0%), respectively. The sensitivity of RDTs, and microscopy was low at very low parasitaemia (<100 parasite/μL), but increased significantly with increasing parasitaemia, reaching ≥99.6% at >10000 parasites/μL (p<0.001).
Conclusion Higher prevalence of malaria was detected and the performance of RDTs and qPCR were comparable, but microscopy had lower performance. Higher sensitivity by RDTs compared to microscopy, indicate that RDTs are effective for detection of malaria infections for routine case management and surveillance of malaria in this area with confirmed ART-R; and can be utilized in the ongoing plans to develop a response to ART-R.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was fully funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number 002202].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee of the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania gave the ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author
Abbreviations and acronyms
- ACT
- Artemisinin-based combination therapy
- AL
- Artemether-Lumefantrine
- aOR
- Adjusted odds ratio
- ART-R
- Artemisinin partial resistance
- CI
- Confidence interval
- CDC
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- cOR
- Crude odds ratios
- CSS
- Cross-sectional survey
- DBS
- Dried blood spots
- DMFP
- District malaria focal person
- GMPD
- Geometric Mean Parasite Density
- IDs
- Identification numbers
- IPTp
- Intermittent preventive treatment
- IQR
- Interquartile range
- IRS
- Indoor residual spraying
- ITN
- Insecticides treated nets
- LSM
- Larval source management
- MRCC
- Medical Research Coordinating Committee
- MSMT
- Molecular surveillance of malaria in Tanzania.
- NIMR
- National Institute for Medical Research
- NMCP
- National Malaria Control Program
- ODK
- Open Data Kit software
- ORs
- Odds ratio
- PCA
- Principal component analysis
- PO-RALG
- President’s Office, Regional Administration and Local Government
- RDTs
- Rapid diagnostic tests
- rRNA
- Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid
- SMPS
- School-children Malaria Parasitological Survey
- SOPs
- Standard Operating Procedures
- WHO
- World Health Organization
