Abstract
Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant global health challenge, resulting in over 1.27 million deaths in 2019 and projected to cause up to 10 million deaths annually in the future. To address this issue, the healthcare sector requires rapid and accurate bacterial identification, which is currently not readily available for effective antimicrobial stewardship. In a UK national first, we implemented 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) in an NHS setting to enhance diagnostic capabilities, aiming to reduce antibiotic misuse and improve patient outcomes.
Methods We implemented 16S rRNA sequencing via ONT, running samples from seven NHS hospitals across Cheshire and Merseyside. We focused on samples from sterile sites, such as “pus”, “fluid”, and “tissue”, typically collected from critical care units. The assay was validated against traditional methods including Sanger sequencing and MALDI-TOF, with a turnaround time of 24-72 hours. Clinical impact was measured by analysing changes in antibiotic regimens and patient outcomes based on 16S assay results over a period of several months post-launch.
Findings ONT 16S rRNA sequencing significantly impacted antibiotic treatment in 34.2% of cases, reducing patient stays and outperforming traditional methods by detecting additional bacterial organisms and identifying bacteria missed by reference labs. It provided species-level identification and confirmed non-infectious conditions in 5.4% of cases, aiding alternative treatment decisions. Its speed, cost-effectiveness, and minimal training requirements contributed to its successful integration into clinical practice.
Interpretation The integration of ONT 16S sequencing into routine NHS diagnostics has significantly improved antimicrobial stewardship by offering a faster, more sensitive, and accurate bacterial identification method. Earlier use of this assay in cases where routine cultures are likely to fail could enhance patient outcomes further by enabling timely, targeted antibiotic therapies, reducing hospital stays, and curbing unnecessary antibiotic use.
Competing Interest Statement
D. C., J. B., A. F., M. M., C. E., S. L., A. L., C. L., M. S., N. S., L. S., V. O., and A. S. are NHS employees.
Funding Statement
Liverpool Clinical Laboratories (LCL) funded this work. E.C.-O. and A.C.D. are affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections at University of Liverpool, in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), in collaboration with University of Warwick. E.C.-O. and A.C.D. are based at The University of Liverpool. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or the UK Health Security Agency.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of Health Research Authority (National Health Service United Kingdom) waived ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Figure 3 revised and new corresponding file uploaded
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
