Abstract
As reductions in malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa stagnate, gene drive-modified mosquitoes represent one of the most promising novel tools for continued disease control. In order to advance from the laboratory to the field, gene drives will be assessed against target product profiles, planning tools that list minimum criteria products should satisfy as they progress through the development pipeline. Here, we use an eco-epidemiological model to investigate parameter values for population modification gene drives that satisfy two previously-discussed target outcomes: a 50% reduction in clinical malaria incidence for a duration (window-of-protection) of at least three years, and a time-to-impact of less than one year. We consider two African settings, Burkina Faso and Kenya, where gene drive mosquitoes are currently being researched, and consider three transmission intensities at each. For the gene drive product, we explore rates of homing and resistance allele generation, fitness costs associated with gene drive and non-functional resistance alleles, and the efficacy of the effector gene(s) at reducing mosquito-to-human transmission. We find that when the window-of-protection criterion is satisfied, the time-to-impact criterion also is. Target outcomes are most influenced by the fitness cost associated with the gene drive allele and effector gene efficacy. Resistance allele parameters are also highly influential on target outcomes, and determine how long the gene drive allele persists in the population after most available wild-type alleles have been cleaved. Low rates of functional resistance allele generation are preferred, while costly non-functional resistance alleles will allow the drive allele to outcompete them. Homing rates already achieved for Anopheles gene drives do not need to be improved upon. A conundrum exists whereby the most important product parameters for predicting field efficacy are those that can only be reliably measured in the field, which presents a challenge for assessment of product readiness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
AM, HMSC and JMM were supported by funds from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-017683) and the UC Irvine Malaria Initiative awarded to JMM. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
