Abstract
Background One Health is a collaborative approach that can be used to evaluate and enhance the sectors of human health, animal health and environmental health and emphasize their sectoral interconnectedness. Empirical evaluation of the one health performance of a country in the form of an index provides direction for actionable interventions such as targeted funding; prioritized resource allocation; rigorous data management and evidence based-policy decisions, amid other efforts such as public engagement and awareness on disease management; environmental degradation and preparedness towards disease outbreaks and thereby strengthening global health security. Thus, developing a One Health Index (OHI) Calculator for India is a significant step towards evidence based one health governance in the context of low-and middle-income countries.
Objectives a) To develop a One Health Index Calculator for India with efficient and ease of use weighting methods and demonstrate the calculation of the One Health Index. b) To develop India-country-specific datasets through secondary data collection from reliable data sources. c) To determine the data gaps for policy stewardship.
Methods We propose a One Health Index calculator to measure the One Health Index from an Indian context by adopting the Global One Health Index framework that comprises of 3 categories, 13 key indicators, 57 indicators and 216 sub-indicators. A secondary data collection was conducted to create a dataset for India from reliable sources. For measuring OHI, we have demonstrated two mathematical weightage methods, an efficient expert-based rating using Fuzzy Extent Analysis (FEA) and Modified Entropy-based Method (MEWM).
Results We demonstrate the step-by-step OHI calculation by determining indicator scores using both FEA and MEWM weightage methods. Through secondary data collection an India-country-specific dataset has been created from reliable sources. From the datasets for India, the indicator values for 156 out of 216 sub-indicators were found available, while there was lack of data for the remaining 60 indicators. Further, a pilot correlation analysis was performed between 20 indicator scores and the relevant budget allocations for the years 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025. It was found that the increase in the budget over consecutive years has shown an increase in indicator score or better performance and vice versa.
Conclusions The demonstrated OHI calculator has the scope to serve as a governance tool, while promoting data transparency and ethical data management. There is a need for a collaborative data federation approach that can resolve data gaps in the form of incomplete, missing and unavailable data. Further the scope of performing correlation analysis between budgetary allocation and performance of indicators gives empirical evidence for policymakers to improve intersectoral communication, multi-stakeholder engagement, concerted interventions, and informed policy decisions for resource allocation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Tata Trusts
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The source data are openly available and obtained using secondary data collection.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
