ABSTRACT
Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) is a promising non-invasive technique for deep-brain stimulation and focal neuromodulation. Research with animal models and computational modelling has raised the possibility that TUS can be biased towards enhancing or suppressing neural function. Here, we first conduct a systematic review of human TUS studies for perturbing neural function and alleviating brain disorders. We then collate a set of hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects and conduct an initial meta-analysis on the human TUS study reported outcomes to date (n = 32 studies, 37 experiments). We find that parameters such as the duty cycle show some predictability regarding whether the targeted area’s function is likely to be enhanced or suppressed. Given that human TUS sample sizes are exponentially increasing, we recognize that results can stabilize or change as further studies are reported. Therefore, we conclude by establishing an Iowa-Newcastle (inTUS) resource for the systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes to support further hypothesis testing for greater precision in brain stimulation and neuromodulation with TUS.
Highlights
Systematic review of human TUS studies for enhancing or suppressing neural function
Collated set of hypotheses on using TUS to bias towards enhancement or suppression
Meta-analysis results identify parameters that may bias the directionality of effects
TUS resource established for systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Supported by National Institutes of Health USA (R01 DC04290), National Science Foundation (2342847) and Medical Research Council (UK). Ben Slater is supported by a BBSRC UK PhD studentship. M.K. was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/W004488/1 and EP/X01925X/1) and the Guangci Professorship Program of Rui Jin Hospital (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
The datasets and R script generated in this study have been deposited in the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/arqp8/ in the Caffaratti_et_al_inTUS_Resource folder.
