ABSTRACT
Purpose Offering equal Patient Access to Precision Oncology (PO) is a major challenge of clinical oncologists and cancer center representatives. Here, we provide an easily transferable model adopted from strategic management science to assess the geographic impact of a cancer center – in terms of general cancer care and PO participation.
Methods As members of the German WERA alliance, the cancer centers Würzburg, Erlangen, Regensburg and Augsburg merged care data regarding their geographical impact. Specifically, we examined the provenance of patients from WERA’s molecular tumor boards (MTBs) between 2020 and 2022 (n = 2243). As second dimension, we added the provenance of patients receiving general cancer care (termed Total Cancer Care, TCC) by WERA. Clustering our outreach along these two dimensions allowed us to set up a four-quadrant matrix consisting of postal code areas with referrals towards WERA. These areas were re-identified on a map of the Federal State of Bavaria and surrounding regions.
Results In terms of positive MTB and general cancer care referrals, the WERA Matrix overlooked an active screening area of n = 821 postal code areas – representing about 50% of Bavaria’s spatial expansion and more than six million inhabitants. The WERA Matrix identified regions successfully connected to our outreach structures in terms of subsidiarity – with general cancer care mainly performed locally but PO performed in cooperation with WERA. At the same time, we detected postal code areas with a potential PO backlog – characterized by high levels of cancer care performed by WERA and low levels or no MTB representation.
Conclusions The WERA Matrix provided a transparent portfolio of postal code areas, which helped assessing the geographical impact of our PO program. We believe that its intuitive principle can easily be transferred to other cancer centers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg, Germany, (Molecular Tumor Board Registry Study, protocol code 20-1682-101). Due to the retrospective nature and the exclusive utilization of anonymized data, this study was also in accordance with German General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and legislation.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
