Abstract
Background Anxiety disorders are a significant societal and individual burden. Psychotherapy, while effective, is often inaccessible, leading to the rise of technology-based solutions like psychotherapeutic mobile apps. This study assesses the immediate impact of twelve exercises from the Mind Ease app, incorporating cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness, and acceptance and commitment therapy, on anxiety.
Methods In a parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with 1108 participants, we compared the effects of these exercises against two controls: reading about anxiety and normal activities. Efficacy was measured with a custom scale validated against the state subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Results All twelve exercises significantly reduced anxiety more than controls (p = 0.002 to <.001, η2P = .06 to .37, d = 0.5 to 1.5).
Conclusions The twelve psychotherapeutic exercises proved highly effective at immediately mitigating feelings of anxiety. Future trials should explore its long-term effects.
Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05850975, https://osf.io/36ukh).
Competing Interest Statement
FK and JFS were funded by Mind Ease for this research project. MZS was funded by Spark Wave for this research project, which is a part owner of Mind Ease. PB was the CEO and SG the founder of Mind Ease. The conflicts of interest were managed as follows: The funder was involved in planning the study but had no role in data collection, the analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the report (apart from limited feedback), or the decision to submit the article for publication. Mind Ease had committed in written form to allowing publication irrespective of the results of the study. The study methods and analyses were preregistered. JB had the final say over decisions and was not funded by Mind Ease or associated organisations.
Clinical Trial
NCT05850975
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
Funding was provided by Mind Ease Labs Ltd (Third Floor South, One Jubilee Street, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 1GE, UK). FK and JFS were funded by Mind Ease for this research project. MZS was funded by Spark Wave for this research project, which is a part owner of Mind Ease. PB was the CEO and SG the founder of Mind Ease. The conflicts of interest were managed as follows: The funder was involved in planning the study but had no role in data collection, the analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the report (apart from limited feedback), or the decision to submit the article for publication. Mind Ease had committed in written form to allowing publication irrespective of the results of the study. The study methods and analyses were preregistered. JB had the final say over decisions and was not funded by Mind Ease or associated organisations.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee of the University of Oxford gave ethical approval for this work (reference number R82884/RE001).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The appendix, protocol, data, code, and output of this study are openly available at the Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/36ukh.
