Abstract
Various measures have been proposed to quantify upper-limb use through wrist-worn inertial measurement units. The two most popular traditional measures of upper-limb use – thresholded activity counts (TAC) and the gross movement (GM) score suffer from high sensitivity and specificity, respectively. We had previously proposed a hybrid version of these two measures – the GMAC – that showed better overall detection performance. However, the previously proposed GMAC used both accelerometer and gyroscope data and used the same parameter values from the TAC and GM measures. In this paper, we aim to answer two important questions to improve the usefulness of the GMAC measure: (a) can the GMAC measure be implemented using only the accelerometer data? (b) what are the optimal parameter values for the GMAC measure? We propose a modified version of the GMAC that works with only accelerometer data, and optimize this measure’s parameters. This optimized GMAC showed better detection performance than the previously proposed GMAC and surprisingly had comparable performance to that of the best-performing machine learning-based measure (random forest inter-subject model). Although intra-subject machine learning-based measures perform better than the optimized GMAC, the latter is simpler, well suited for real-time upper-limb use detection, and is the best option when a trained machine learning-based intra-subject model or labeled data is unavailable. The optimized GMAC measure can be a useful measure for either offline detection or for real-time detection and feedback of upper limb use.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://github.com/biorehab/upper-limb-use-assessment
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://github.com/biorehab/upper-limb-use-assessment and https://github.com/siva82kb/gmac
