Abstract
Colonoscopy is accurate but inefficient for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention due to the low (~7-8%) prevalence of target lesions, advanced adenomas. We leveraged rectal mucosa to identify patients who harbor CRC field carcinogenesis by evaluating chromatin 3D architecture. Supranucleosomal disordered chromatin chains (~5-20 nm, ~1 kbp) fold into chromatin packing domains (~100-200 nm, ~100–1,000 kbp). In turn, the fractal-like conformation of DNA within chromatin domains and the folding of the genome into packing domains has been shown to influence multiple facets of gene transcription, including the transcriptional plasticity of cancer cells. We deployed an optical spectroscopic nanosensing technique, chromatin-sensitive partial wave spectroscopic microscopy (csPWS), to evaluate the packing density scaling D of the chromatin chain conformation within packing domains from rectal mucosa in 256 patients with varying degrees of progression to colorectal cancer. We found average packing scaling D of chromatin domains was elevated in tumor cells, histologically normal-appearing cells 4 cm proximal to the tumor, and histologically normal-appearing rectal mucosa compared to cells from control patients (p<0.001). Nuclear D had a robust correlation with the model of 5-year risk of CRC with r2=0.94. Furthermore, rectal D was evaluated as a screening biomarker for patients with advanced adenomas presenting an AUC of 0.85 and 85% sensitivity and specificity. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced csPWS improved diagnostic performance with AUC=0.90. Considering the low sensitivity of existing CRC tests, including liquid biopsies, to early-stage cancers our work highlights the potential of chromatin biomarkers of field carcinogenesis in detecting early, significant precancerous colon lesions.
Competing Interest Statement
Drs. Backman, Subramanian, and Roy are cofounders and/or shareholders in NanoCytomics LLC. All aspects of this study were done under the supervision of the Conflict of Interest Committee at Northwestern University.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants U54CA268084, R01CA228272, R01CA225002, and NSF grant EFMA-1830961 with philanthropic support from Rob and Kristin Goldman, David Sachs and the Christina Carinato Charitable Foundation
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All studies performed and samples collected were under the approval of the Institutional Review Board at NorthShore University Health System, the University of Chicago, and Indiana University. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and written informed consent was obtained from all participants undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. The exclusion criteria for recruitment included incomplete colonoscopy due to failure to visualize the cecum or patients with coagulopathy, past medical history of pelvic radiation, or systemic chemotherapy. Patient demographic information including age, sex, smoking and drinking history were gathered. The diagnostic criteria for each and all subjects were made by a board accredited GI specialist and pathologist based on colonoscopy and pathology reports.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
