Abstract
Non-protein-coding genetic variants are a major driver of the genetic risk for human disease; however, identifying which non-coding variants contribute to which diseases, and their mechanisms, remains challenging. In-silico variant prioritization methods quantify a variant’s severity in the context of having a phenotypic effect; but for most methods the specific phenotype and disease context of the prediction are poorly defined. For example, many commonly used methods provide a single organism-wide score for each variant, while other methods summarize a variant’s impact specifically in certain tissues and/or cell-types. Here we propose a complementary disease-specific variant prioritization scheme, which is motivated by the observation that the variants contributing to different diseases often operate through different biological mechanisms.
We combine tissue/cell-type specific scores into disease-specific scores with a logistic regression approach and apply it to 25,000 non-coding variants spanning 111 diseases. We show that disease-specific aggregation of tissue/cell-type specific scores (GenoSkyline, Fit-Cons2, DNA accessibility) signifiantly improves the association of common non-coding genetic variants with disease (average precision: 0.151, baseline=0.09), compared with organism-wide scores (GenoCanyon, LINSIGHT, GWAVA, eigen, CADD; average precision: 0.129, base-line=0.09). Calculating disease similari-ties based on data-driven aggregation weights highlights meaningful disease groups (e.g., immune system related diseases and mental/behavioral disorders), and it provides information about tissues and cell-types that drive these similarities (e.g., lymphoblastoid T-cells for immune-system diseases). We also show that so-learned similarities are complementary to genetic similarities as quantified by genetic correlation. Overall, our aggregation approach demonstrates the strengths of disease-specific variant prioritization, leads to improvement in non-coding variant prioritization, and it enables interpretable models that link variants to disease via specific tissues and/or cell-types.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study used only openly available human data that were located at the URLs provided in the methods section.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
