Abstract
India has seen Menstrual Hygiene Scheme for 15-19 aged adolescents as a mass movement in 2011 with Intervention, Education, Communication (IEC) interventions and subsidized menstrual product. While the phenomenal increase in hygienic menstrual usage during 2010-20 is celebrated, it leaves us to question if this is the MHS in play or a gradual transition due to overall developmental drive. As the age-cohorts move out of the beneficiary net over time, sustainability of the program can only be reflected if there is a behavioral change which is captured through difference in choice patterns over duration of program exposure. Using triple difference-in- difference methodology on unit level data from NFHS 4, the results find that overall the program fails to mark any significant effect on choice of hygienic product in India. However, the low rung of the cohorts in terms of education and media exposure reap the benefit of the scheme, leaving the better-off counterparts unaffected. This concludes that the issues targeted through the scheme is holistic to reach the lowest strata of the society, but a proper choice of target cohort can considerably reduce the project cost, free it of supply side inefficiencies and enhance targeting of IEC techniques, thereby making the scheme more effective.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
If the data are all contained within the manuscript and/or Supporting Information files, enter the following: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.