Abstract
The AVERT PRETERM trial (NCT03151330) evaluated whether screening clinically low-risk pregnancies with a validated maternal blood biomarker test for spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) risk, followed by preventive treatments for those screening positive, would improve neonatal outcomes compared to a clinically low-risk historical population that had received usual care. Prospective arm participants with singleton non-anomalous pregnancies and no PTB history were tested for sPTB risk at 191/7-206/7 weeks’ gestation and followed through neonatal discharge. Screen-positive individuals (≥16% sPTB risk) were offered vaginal progesterone (200 mg) and aspirin (81 mg) daily, with twice-weekly nurse phone calls. Co-primary outcomes were neonatal morbidity and mortality, measured using a validated composite index (NMI), and neonatal hospital length of stay (NNLOS). Endpoints were assessed using survival analysis and logistic regression in a modified intent-to-treat population comprising screen-negative individuals and screen-positive individuals accepting treatment. Of 1460 eligible participants, 34.7% screened positive; of these, 56.4% accepted interventions and 43.6% declined. Compared to historical controls, prospective arm neonates whose mothers accepted treatment had lower NMI scores (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI, 0.67-0.98, P=0.03) and an 18% reduction in severe morbidity. NNLOS was shorter (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.92, P=0.01), with a 21% mean stay decrease among neonates having the longest stays. Sensitivity analyses of the entire intent-to-treat population supported these findings. These results suggest that biomarker PTB risk stratification and preventive interventions can ameliorate PTB complications in singleton, often nulliparous, pregnancies historically deemed low risk.
Competing Interest Statement
B.S., J.S., and M.G.W. are paid consultants of Sera Prognostics, Inc. For the purposes of this study, J.S. and M.G.W. reported to M.K.H. and were paid consultants of ChristianaCare, and B.S. was supported by Sera Prognostics, Inc. M.K.H. received an investigator-initiated grant from Sera Prognostics, Inc., to conduct this study. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study plan was mutually agreed upon by the investigators and the funder; however, the funder was blinded to study results until after data lock and analysis completion.
Clinical Trial
NCT03151330
Clinical Protocols
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03151330
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Sera Prognostics, Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol (NCT03151330) was approved by the ChristianaCare institutional review board prior to participant enrollment. An independent data and safety monitoring board convened prior to study initiation, approved the protocol, and provided oversight of adverse events. All participants provided written informed consent, and all authors accept responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the data and for fidelity in the conduct of the trial.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
ckitto{at}christianacare.org (C.K.); zzhang{at}christianacare.org (Z.Z.); kruhstaller{at}dcmfm.com (K.H.)
jshi{at}alumni.stanford.edu (J.S.); mwalker{at}stanfordalumni.org (M.G.W.)
Analysis of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was added.
Data Availability
Data supporting the results presented here can be requested by emailing the corresponding author. Data will not be made available publicly or in any format that may violate a study participant′s right to privacy.
