ABSTRACT
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a widely employed assessment tool for measuring the severity of cognitive impairment. Among the MMSE items, the pentagon copying test (PCT) requires participants to accurately replicate a sample of two interlocking pentagons. While the PCT are traditionally scored on a binary scale, there has been limited developments of granular scoring scale to assess task performance. In this paper, we present a novel three-stage algorithm, called Quantification of Interlocking Pentagons (QIP), which quantifies PCT performance by computing the areas of individual pentagons and their intersection areas, and a balance ratio between the areas of the two individual pentagons. The three stages of the QIP algorithm include: (1) detection of line segments, (2) unraveling of the interlocking pentagons, and (3) quantification of areas. The QIP algorithm was applied to 497 cases from 84 participants. Analysis of the quantified data revealed a significant inverse relationship between age and balance ratio between two pentagon areas (beta = -0.49, p = 0.0033), indicating that older age was associated with a smaller balance ratio. The QIP algorithm enhanced the scoring of performance in the PCT. It can serve as a useful tool for granular level scoring of PCT.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by R01AG015819, R01AG17917, R01AG056405, R01AG059732, P30AG072975, R01AG075728, and R01AG055430.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All studies were approved by an Institutional Review Board of Rush University Medical Center. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
