Abstract
Objectives To investigate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the superficial cranial arteries in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).
Methods Retrospectively, 156 patients with clinically suspected GCA were included. A new 4-point ordinal DWI rating scale was developed. A post-contrast, fat-suppressed, T1-weighted “black-blood” sequence (T1-BB) was rated for comparison. Ten arterial segments were assessed: common superficial temporal arteries, temporal and parietal branches, occipital and posterior auricular arteries bilaterally. The expert clinical diagnosis after ≥ 6 months of follow-up was the diagnostic reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated for different rating methods.
Results The study cohort consisted of 87 patients with and 69 without GCA. For DWI, the area under the curve was 0.90. For a cut-off of ≥ 2 consecutive pathological slices, DWI showed a sensitivity of 75.9%, a specificity of 94.2% and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09. With a cut-off of ≥ 3 consecutive pathological slices, sensitivity was 70.1%, specificity was 98.6%, and the positive likelihood ratio was 48.38. For the T1-BB, values were 88.5%, 88.4% and 7.63, respectively. The inter-rater analysis for DWI with a cut-off of ≥ 2 pathological slices showed a kappa of 1.00 on the patient level and 0.85 on the arterial segment level. For the T1-BB the kappa was 0.78 and 0.79, respectively.
Conclusion DWI of the superficial cranial arteries demonstrates a good diagnostic accuracy and reliability for the diagnosis of GCA. DWI is widely available and can be used immediately in clinical practice for patients with suspected GCA.
Competing Interest Statement
LS, SB, LB, FW, FL and PS have nothing to disclose. BM: grants from Novartis; consulting fees from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jannsen-Cilag, GSK; speaker fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Otsuka, MSD; congress support from Medtalk, Pfizer, Roche, Actelion, Mepha, and MSD; patent mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143). HMB: consulting fees and speaker fees from Novartis.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics committee/IRB (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern) of the Inselspital (University Hospital Bern, Switzerland) gave ethical approval for this work (ID: 2021-02169).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
