Abstract
Background Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a common and consequential disorder. When applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduces craving across substance use disorders and may have a therapeutic clinical effect when applied in serial sessions. The present study sought to preliminarily determine whether serial sessions of rTMS applied to the DLPFC had a therapeutic effect in CUD.
Methods This study was a two-site, phase-2, double-blind, randomized-controlled-trial. Seventy-two treatment-seeking participants (37.5% Women, mean age 30.2±9.9SD) with ≥moderate-CUD were randomized to active or sham rTMS (Beam-F3, 10Hz, 20-total-sessions, with cannabis cues) while undergoing a three-session motivational enhancement therapy intervention. The primary outcome was the change in craving between pre- and post- treatment (Marijuana Craving Questionnaire Short-Form—MCQ-SF). Secondary outcomes included the number of weeks of abstinence and the number of days-per-week of cannabis use during 4-weeks of follow-up.
Results There were no significant differences in craving between conditions. Participants who received active rTMS reported numerically, but not significantly, more weeks of abstinence in the follow-up period than those who received sham rTMS (15.5%-Active; 9.3%-Sham; rate ratio = 1.66 [95% CI: 0.84, 3.28]; p=0.14). Participants who received active rTMS reported fewer days-per-week of cannabis use over the final two-weeks of the follow-up period (Active vs. Sham: -0.72; Z=-2.33, p=0.02).
Conclusions This trial suggests rTMS is safe and feasible in individuals with CUD and may have a therapeutic effect on frequency of cannabis use, though further study is needed with additional rTMS-sessions and a longer follow-up period.
Highlights This phase-2 RCT tested the efficacy of prefrontal rTMS for cannabis use disorder
The study paradigm was safe and feasible, and participants tolerated rTMS well
The active-group had numerically more weeks of abstinence during follow-up
The active-group had fewer days-per-week of cannabis use during follow-up
More rTMS and a longer follow-up may result in a larger effect in future studies
Competing Interest Statement
GLS has collaborated with MagVenture and MECTA as part of investigator-initiated trials. He additionally consults for and has equity in the company Trial Catalyst. TJF is employed by Magnus Medical and holds stock/equity options. NRW is a named inventor on Stanford-owned intellectual property relating to accelerated TMS pulse pattern sequences and neuroimaging-based TMS targeting; he has served on scientific advisory boards for Otsuka, NeuraWell, Magnus Medical, and Nooma as a paid advisor; and he has equity/stock options in Magnus Medical, NeuraWell, and Nooma. EBS is a paid consultant for Neuronetics and is an equity holder of Bodhi Neurotech. MSG has the following disclosures; Babystrong (patent co-holder), Brainsway (unpaid consultant, research grant, donated equipment for research trials), Magnus Medical (unpaid scientific Advisor), Magstim (unpaid consultant, donated equipment for research trials), MECTA (unpaid consultant, research grant, donated equipment for research grant), Microtransponder (DSMB member), Neuronetics (unpaid consultant, research grant, donated equipment for research), NeoSync (unpaid consultant, DSMB member), Neuralief (scientific advisory board, research grant, and Sooma (scientific advisory board), and he is an editor of the Elsevier journal Brain Stimulation. ALM has received research support from PleoPharma. None of the other authors have any relevant conflicts to disclose.
Clinical Trial
NCT03144232
Funding Statement
The National Institutes of Health supported this work via grant numbers K23DA043628 (PI: Sahlem NIH/NIDA), K12DA031794 (Co-PI's McRae-Clark and Gray NIH/NIDA), and K24DA038240 (PI: McRae-Clark, NIH/NIDA).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Boards of both the Medical University of South Carolina and Stanford University reviewed and approved this protocol.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
