Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Machine learning algorithms in spatiotemporal gait analysis can identify patients with Parkinson’s disease

View ORCID ProfileP. Vinuja R. Fernando, Marcus Pannu, Pragadesh Natarajan, R. Dineth Fonseka, Naman Singh, Shivanthika Jayalath, Monish M. Maharaj, Ralph J. Mobbs
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.03.23292200
P. Vinuja R. Fernando
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Vinuja R. Fernando
  • For correspondence: vfernandoresearch{at}gmail.com
Marcus Pannu
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pragadesh Natarajan
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Dineth Fonseka
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naman Singh
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shivanthika Jayalath
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monish M. Maharaj
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
4Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
5NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph J. Mobbs
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
3Wearables and Gait Analysis Research Group (WAGAR), Sydney, Australia
4Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
5NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Changes to spatiotemporal gait metrics in gait-altering conditions are characteristic of the pathology. This data can be interpreted by machine learning (ML) models which have recently emerged as an adjunct to clinical medicine. However, the literature is undecided regarding its utility in diagnosing pathological gait and is heterogeneous in its approach to applying ML techniques. This study aims to address these gaps in knowledge. This was a prospective observational study involving 32 patients with Parkinson’s disease and 88 ‘normative’ subjects. Spatiotemporal gait metrics were gathered from all subjects using the MetaMotionC inertial measurement unit and data obtained were used to train and evaluate the performance of 10 machine learning models. Principal component analysis and Genetic Algorithm were amongst the feature selection techniques used. Classification models included Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve – Bayes, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Networks. ML algorithms can accurately distinguish pathological gait in Parkinson’s disease from that of normative controls. Two models which used the Random Forest classifier with Principal Component analysis and Genetic Algorithm feature selection techniques separately, were 100% accurate in its predictions and had an F1 score of 1. A third model using principal component analysis and Artificial neural networks was equally as successful (100% accuracy, F1 = 1). We conclude that ML algorithms can accurately distinguish pathological gait from normative controls in Parkinson’s Disease. Random Forest classifiers, with Genetic Algorithm feature selection are the preferred ML techniques for this purpose as they produce the highest performing model.

Author summary The way humans walk, are emblematic of their overall health status. These walking patterns, otherwise, can be captured as gait metrics from small and portable wearable sensors. Data gathered from these sensors can be interpreted by machine learning algorithms which can then be used to accurately distinguish healthy and non-healthy patients based on their gait or walking pattern. The applications of this technology are many and varied. Firstly, it can be used to simply aid in diagnosis as explored in this paper. In future, researchers may use their understanding of normal and pathological gait, and their differences to quantify how severely one’s gait is affected in a disease state. This data can be used to track, and quantify, improvements or further deteriorations post treatment, whether these be medication-based or interventions like surgery. Retrospective analyses on data such as this can be used to judge the value of an intervention in reducing a patient’s disability, and advise health related expenditure.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NA

Funding Statement

No funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Approval was obtained from the South-Eastern Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia (HREC 17/184).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Able to be accessed in a Google Drive link. Deidentified Normative Database: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L2ua-LERcYig1LzS2DwjU-g0PVE1SKqfS69j8WcKIZ8/edit?usp=sharing Deidentified Parkinson's Database: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Sc6JL0UmtiEIJCmD1R2jbsuGXDIy24SxbmkdQKDJg-4/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L2ua-LERcYig1LzS2DwjU-g0PVE1SKqfS69j8WcKIZ8/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Sc6JL0UmtiEIJCmD1R2jbsuGXDIy24SxbmkdQKDJg-4/edit?usp=sharing

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 06, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Machine learning algorithms in spatiotemporal gait analysis can identify patients with Parkinson’s disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Machine learning algorithms in spatiotemporal gait analysis can identify patients with Parkinson’s disease
P. Vinuja R. Fernando, Marcus Pannu, Pragadesh Natarajan, R. Dineth Fonseka, Naman Singh, Shivanthika Jayalath, Monish M. Maharaj, Ralph J. Mobbs
medRxiv 2023.07.03.23292200; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.03.23292200
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Machine learning algorithms in spatiotemporal gait analysis can identify patients with Parkinson’s disease
P. Vinuja R. Fernando, Marcus Pannu, Pragadesh Natarajan, R. Dineth Fonseka, Naman Singh, Shivanthika Jayalath, Monish M. Maharaj, Ralph J. Mobbs
medRxiv 2023.07.03.23292200; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.03.23292200

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Surgery
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (868)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4482)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (615)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15278)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1133)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6645)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4605)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1623)
  • Hematology (544)
  • HIV/AIDS (1276)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15961)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1111)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (674)
  • Neurology (6695)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1153)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3369)
  • Ophthalmology (988)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (669)
  • Pediatrics (1704)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (700)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5495)
  • Public and Global Health (9285)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2223)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1201)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (721)
  • Sports Medicine (535)
  • Surgery (722)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (267)