Abstract
Background Scarce data exist regarding the occurrence of mitral valve interference after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Venus-A valve implantation. Several case reports have noted that the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) is mechanically affected by the prosthesis frame, particularly when implanted in a low position. This study aimed to investigate the potential factors influencing the clinical outcomes of AML interference after Venus-A valve implantation.
Methods We retrospectively included 20 severe aortic valve stenosis patients who had undergone TAVR and had been implanted with the Venus-A valve at our hospital between October 2020 and June 2021. Pre- and post-procedural CT scans were used for the FEops HEARTguide simulation. Anatomically influencing factors were measured using the 3mensio software and derived from the FEops HEARTguide. The prosthesis-AML interference (PAI) was defined when it met both of two criteria:1) significant interference and limited AML movement shown by transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiography, and 2) more than half cell intersection between the simulated Venus-A valve and the reconstructed AML revealed by the FEops HEARTguide. Anatomical factors and clinical outcomes were compared between the PAI and non-PAI groups.
Results Nine PAI patients and 11 non-PAI cases were identified. PAI was associated with shorter mitral-aortic annulus distance (2.7±1.7 mm vs 5.0±2.2 mm, P = 0.019), larger prosthesis valve size (P = 0.013), deeper implantation (12.2±3.3 mm vs 6.2±2.9 mm at non-coronary cusp side, P < 0.001) and less calcification of non-coronary cusp (median calcification score, 52.2 mm3 vs 156.0 mm3, P = 0.046). Regarding the clinical impact, PAI was associated with a higher rate of moderate or severe perivalvular leakage before discharge than those associated with the absence of PAI, with no difference in haemodynamic parameters and incidence of adverse events at the 30-day and 12-month follow-ups between the groups.
Conclusions Interference between the Venus-A prosthesis valve and AML after TAVR was associated with a shorter mitral-aortic annulus distance, larger prosthesis usage, greater implantation depth, and less calcification of the non-coronary cusp. However, further studies are required to explore its long-term clinical impact.
Competing Interest Statement
Nic Debusschere and Giorgia Rocatello are employees of Feops NV. Sihang Cheng is an employee of Venus Medtech. The other authors report no disclosures of competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Chongqing Talents Project (Jin Jun) and Young Doctor Incubation Program of Xinqiao Hospital (2022YQB094).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital (Xinqiao Hospital) of the Army Military Medical University, and the requirement for informed consent was waived because of its retrospective design.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.
