Abstract
Objectives Numerous studies of child growth conducted in industrialised countries showed presence of the phenomenon of the adolescent growth spurt to the extent that its presence became a dogma applied to humans as a species. However, earliest observations of growth at adolescence and also observations of adolescent growth conducted in small traditional societies do not show pubertal spurts consistently. Longitudinal observations of growth of individuals in present-day societies show strong polymorphism of the age at which puberty starts and ends and the magnitude of growth acceleration during puberty. Some normally developing individuals may not experience the pubertal growth spurt.
Design, Seeting, Participants Longitudinal height growth data of 110 girls aged 6-18 years from homogenous socio-economic situation – one medical high school (=nursing college) in one large Polish city of Lodz.
Results 18 (16%) girls did not show statistically significant acceleration of body height growth while they reached the same adult height as their spurting peers. Girls who experienced growth spurt had the age at peak height velocity of 11.2 years and peak height velocity of 69.3 mm, comparable to those found in many other studies. There was a negative correlation of adult height with variation of individual accelerations (r-0.24, p=0.01) – girls whose accelerations differed less from year to year achieved greater adult heights.
Conclusions Findings of no pubertal spurts in some individuals have been made in other samples studied by other authors, though rarely reported. It can be argued that slow growth at adolescence was more favourable in conditions of limited access to nutrition and medical care while polymorphisms determining fast, uneven growth became more prevalent after industrialisation that, together with progress in health sciences, relaxed natural selection on patterns of growth. Individuals who do not experience pubertal growth spurts, but are otherwise healthy, should not be subject to clinical interventions.
What is already known on this topic Pubertal growth spurt in body height is considered a typical feature of postnatal development. There is a large polymorphism of the age at which the spurt occurs and of its intensity.
Individuals who do not experience the spurt, but are otherwise healthy, may be subject to uncesessary clinical interventions.
What this study adds Among 110 female students of an urban secondary nursing college studied longitudinally from 6 to 16 years, 16% did not experience acceleration of growth at puberty.
Similar findings were reported in the literature from some non-Westernised communities and from European 19th century populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research was carried out in collaboration with the local education administration (Board of Education), school heads, parents and children. Each child was asked for oral consent to be examined by a member of the anthropometric team, and children who refused were not measured. All members of the research crew spoke the local language (Polish). The whole procedure was approved by the Research Bioethics Committee of the University of Lodz (KBBN-UŁ).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Competeing interests All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Transparency declaration The lead author* affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors