ABSTRACT
Introduction There is limited real-world evidence describing the effectiveness of early treatments for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the period where Omicron was the dominant variant. Here we describe characteristics and acute clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 treated with a monoclonal antibody (mAb; presumed to be sotrovimab) across six distinct periods covering the emergence and subsequent dominance of Omicron subvariants (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5) in England.
Methods Retrospective cohort study using data from Hospital Episode Statistics database between 1st January – 31st July 2022. Included patients were aged ≥12 years and received a mAb delivered by a National Health Service (NHS) hospital as a day-case, for which the primary diagnosis was COVID-19. Patients were presumed to have received sotrovimab on the basis of available NHS data showing that 99.98% of individuals who received COVID-19 treatment during the period covered by the study were actually treated with sotrovimab. COVID-19-attributable hospitalisations were reported overall and across six distinct periods of Omicron sub-variant prevalence. A multivariate Poisson regression model was used to estimate incidence rate ratios for each period. Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with severe renal disease and active cancer.
Results In total, 10,096 patients were included. The most common high-risk comorbidities were Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disorders (43.0%; n = 4,337), severe renal disease (14.1%; n = 1,422), rare neurological conditions (10.4%; n = 1,053) and active cancer (9.0%; n = 910). The proportions of patients with a COVID-19-attributable hospitalisation was 1.0% (n = 96), or with a hospital visit due to any cause was 4.6% (n = 465) during the acute period. The percentage of patients who died due to any cause during the acute study period was 0.3% (n = 27). COVID-19-attributable hospitalisation rates were consistent among subgroups and no significant differences (p-values ranged from 0.13 to 0.64) were observed across periods of Omicron subvariants.
Conclusion Low levels of COVID-19-attributable hospitalisations and deaths were recorded in mAb-treated patients. Results were consistent for patients with severe renal disease and active cancer. No evidence of differences in hospitalisation rates were observed whilst Omicron BA.1, and BA.2 or BA.5 subvariants were predominant, despite reported reductions in in vitro neutralisation activity of sotrovimab against BA.2 and BA.5.
Competing Interest Statement
Vishal Patel (at time of study), Daniel C. Gibbons, Myriam Drysdale, Emily J. Lloyd, Moushmi Singh and Helen J. Birch are employees of and/or hold stocks/shares in GSK. Bethany Levick and Stephen Boult are employees of Harvey Walsh Ltd. (OPEN Health), who received funding from GSK to support conduct of this study.
Funding Statement
This study was sponsored by Vir Biotechnology, Inc., in collaboration with GSK (219450).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Independent Group Advising on the Release of Data (IGARD) advisory body to NHS Digital gave approval for the use of HES data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Acknowledgements updated.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NHS-Digital via the Data Access Request Service (DARS) repository. Copyright ©2023 Re-used with the permission of NHS Digital.
