ABSTRACT
Background GBP510 vaccine contains self-assembling, recombinant nanoparticles displaying SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domains. We report interim phase 3 immunogenicity results for GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03 (GBP510/AS03) compared with ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca) up to 2 weeks after the second dose, and safety data up to a median of 2.5 months follow-up.
Methods Randomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational study: Cohort 1 (no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 vaccination, n=1956) randomised 2:1 to receive two doses of GBP510/AS03 or ChAdOx1-S (immunogenicity and safety); Cohort 2 (regardless of baseline serostatus; n=2080) randomised 5:1 (safety). Primary objectives: demonstrate superiority in geometric mean titre (GMT) and non-inferiority in seroconversion rate (SCR; ≥4-fold rise from baseline) of GBP510/AS03 versus ChAdOx1-S for neutralising antibodies against the ancestral strain by live-virus neutralisation assay. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and reactogenicity.
Findings At 2 weeks after the second vaccination, the GMT ratio (GBP510/AS03 / ChAdOx1-S) was 2.93 (95% CI 2.63–3.27), demonstrating superiority (95% CI lower limit >1). The between-group SCR difference of 10.76% (95% CI 7.68–14.32) satisfied the non-inferiority criterion (95% CI lower limit > −5%).The proportion of subjects with adverse events (AEs) after any vaccination was higher with GBP510/AS03 versus ChAdOx1-S for solicited local AEs (56.69% vs 49.20%), but was similar for solicited systemic AEs (51.21% vs 53.51%) and unsolicited AEs (13.27% vs 14.56%). No safety concerns were identified during follow-up for a median 2.5-months after the second vaccination.
Interpretation GBP510/AS03 met the superiority criterion for neutralising antibodies and non-inferiority criterion for SCR compared with ChAdOx1-S, and showed a clinically acceptable safety profile.
Funding This work was supported, in whole or in part, by funding from CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Investments INV-010680 and INV-006462. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supported this project for the generation of IND-enabling data and CEPI supported this clinical study.
Evidence before this study Immunobridging has been proposed as an approach for assessing new COVID-19 vaccines by comparing the immunogenicity of candidate vaccines with an active comparator with demonstrated clinical efficacy. We searched PubMed up to 26 October 2022 for immunobridging clinical trials comparing a candidate vaccine with an approved vaccine, using the terms “immunobridging”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “COVID-19”, and “vaccine”. A phase 2/3 study showed that the ChAdOx1 vaccine, manufactured by the Serum Institute of India after technology transfer from Oxford University/AstraZeneca, had a non-inferior immune response compared to the original ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) vaccine. A post hoc analysis of phase 2 data found that MVC-COV1901 vaccine (a protein subunit vaccine developed by Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation, Taiwan) was non-inferior to ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) with respect to neutralising antibody titres. A phase 3 study found that VLA2001 (an adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus vaccine developed by Valneva, Austria) was superior to ChAdOx1 with respect to neutralising antibody titres and non-inferior with respect to seroconversion rates.
Added value of this study This is the first study comparing the immunogenicity of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 protein nanoparticle vaccine GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03 versus ChAdOx1-S. Interim analysis found that two-dose vaccination with GBP510/AS03 induced stronger neutralising antibody immune responses compared with ChAdOx1-S against the ancestral D614G strain at 2 weeks after the second dose. GBP510/AS03 had an acceptable safety profile during a median 2.5 months of follow-up.
Implications of the available evidence This interim analysis suggests that GBP510/AS03 induces strong neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain and has an acceptable safety profile.
Competing Interest Statement
This study was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf declare: MA, FS, FR, AP, TB, and PW are employees of the GSK group of companies. MC, FR, TB, and AP hold restricted shares in the GSK group of companies. HK, JHR, SJL, YWP, HKP, YYL, and SGK are full-time employees of SK Bioscience. HK, YWP, JHR, YYL, and HKP own SK Bioscience stock as employees. HKP and YYL participated in the blinded session of data safety monitoring board as observers (NCT05007951). SS, MS, ND, PT, SD, SS, and BS are full-time employees of IVI. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Clinical Trial
NCT05007951
Funding Statement
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by funding from CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Investments INV-010680 and INV-006462. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supported this project for the generation of IND-enabling data and CEPI supported this clinical study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea (MFDS), Food and Drug Administration of Philippines (PFDA), Food and Drug Administration of Thailand (TFDA), Ministry of Health of Vietnam (MOH), New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (MEDSAFE), and local EC/IRBs gave ethical approcal for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All authors reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content and approved the final draft for submission. All authors have full access to all the data in the study and accept responsibility to submit for publication. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version.
