Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A predictive model of a growing fetus

View ORCID ProfileChandrani Kumari, View ORCID ProfileGautam I Menon, View ORCID ProfileLeelavati Narlikar, View ORCID ProfileUma Ram, View ORCID ProfileRahul Siddharthan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.22.22283844
Chandrani Kumari
1The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India
2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chandrani Kumari
Gautam I Menon
1The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India
2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
3Departments of Physics and Biology, Ashoka University, Sonepat, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gautam I Menon
Leelavati Narlikar
4Department of Data Science, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leelavati Narlikar
  • For correspondence: leelavati@iiserpune.ac.in drumaram@gmail.com rsidd@imsc.res.in
Uma Ram
5Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seethapathy Clinic and Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Uma Ram
  • For correspondence: leelavati@iiserpune.ac.in drumaram@gmail.com rsidd@imsc.res.in
Rahul Siddharthan
1The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India
2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rahul Siddharthan
  • For correspondence: leelavati@iiserpune.ac.in drumaram@gmail.com rsidd@imsc.res.in
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fetal growth is monitored periodically during pregnancy via ultrasound measurements of fetal dimensions such as femur length (FL), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and biparietal diameter (BPD). Multiple growth standards have been published for each of these, which are clinically used to place a fetus on a “growth chart”. These consist of percentile tables varying by weeks of gestation, computed from cohorts of “low-risk” women with healthy lifestyles, living conditions, and clinical parameters. Such charts are prescriptive of ideal growth, but not necessarily descriptive of diverse real-world populations where they may be used. Moreover, they are constructed by pooling all fetal measurements across the cohort, not based on a growth model, and therefore not necessarily predictive of growth of an individual fetus.

We show that the Gompertz model, a standard model for constrained growth, with just three intuitive parameters, convincingly fits the growth of fetal ultrasound biometries. Two of these parameters—t0 (the inflection time) and c (the rate of decrease of growth rate)—can be treated as universal to all fetuses, while the third parameter A can be modeled as an overall scale parameter specific to each fetus, which captures the individual variation in growth. On our cohort of 817 pregnant women (“Seethapathy cohort”), we show that not only can the value of A for each fetus be inferred from ultrasound data available by the second or the third trimester, but the weight of the baby at delivery can also be predicted with remarkable accuracy using these inferred Gompertz parameters. A model trained on the Seethapathy cohort performs well in estimating the birth weight in an independent validation cohort of 365 women, demonstrating the predictive power of the model. Moreover, we find that deviation from Gompertz-like growth is linked to neonatal complications. Finally, we show that the Gompertz growth curve is a close fit to the standards from WHO, NICHD and INTERGROWTH, with the optimal t0 and c close to that in the Seethapathy cohort. We propose that the Gompertz formula be a basis for future growth standards, with almost all variation described by a single scale parameter A, which can serve either as a descriptor of mean or variance in population, or as a descriptor for growth of an individual fetus. Indeed, the formula is descriptive of typical growth, predictive of future growth, and may be used in prescriptive standards.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

We acknowledge funding from BIRAC grant bt/ki-data0404/06/18 (LN, GM, UR, RS), and the IMSc Centre for Disease Modelling (ICDM) funded via an apex project at IMSc by the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (CK, RS)

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Independent Ethics Committee of the Fetal Care Research Foundation, Chennai, gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available online at https://github.com/chandranikumari/FetusGrowthModel

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 22, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A predictive model of a growing fetus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A predictive model of a growing fetus
Chandrani Kumari, Gautam I Menon, Leelavati Narlikar, Uma Ram, Rahul Siddharthan
medRxiv 2022.12.22.22283844; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.22.22283844
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A predictive model of a growing fetus
Chandrani Kumari, Gautam I Menon, Leelavati Narlikar, Uma Ram, Rahul Siddharthan
medRxiv 2022.12.22.22283844; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.22.22283844

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (552)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1752)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (658)
  • Epidemiology (10793)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (586)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2943)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (532)
  • Health Informatics (1923)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (628)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12510)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (688)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2792)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1461)
  • Ophthalmology (443)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (365)
  • Primary Care Research (336)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2638)
  • Public and Global Health (5354)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1009)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)