ABSTRACT
While social media is increasingly leveraged to engage knowledge users in research priority-setting, there remains sparse explicit descriptions on how to implement it to build knowledge user-led research agendas. The aim of this study was to review a case study where social media was utilized to engage Canadians within the pediatric cancer community in a research priority-setting exercise; specifically highlighting the social media-based recruitment process, including recommendations on how to optimally engage key potential participants. A priority-setting partnership was launched to develop a stakeholder-driven research agenda in pediatric cancer in Canada. Social –media-based strategies were implemented for participant recruitment, developing a website, launching graphics and advertisements, and engaging internal and external stakeholders. These strategies incorporated the use of various social media platforms. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data, in addition to the analytics provided by the platforms mentioned. Throughout the duration of the PSP, we garnered 870 Instagram followers, 450 Twitter followers, 69 Facebook page likes, 27 TikTok followers, 20 LinkedIn followers and 789 unique visitors to our website. Our Facebook page reached 28,641 people, while our Instagram profile reached 2,954 people. This social media campaign resulted in 330 individuals completing the initial survey of the PSP, and 197 individuals completing the interim prioritization survey. Social media is a novel approach to engage stakeholders in the development of a research agenda. Our study identified the following strategies as effective in increasing participation in our PSP: (1) creating a unified brand, (2) prioritizing accessibility (e.g., providing alternative text for all images), (3) ensuring social media campaign is reflective of the target audience by diversifying platforms and intermittently tailoring content to specific populations, (4) optimizing campaign’s reach via paid advertisements and circulating promotional material to partner organizations and individuals for them to subsequently share with their networks.
AUTHOR SUMMARY Our study evaluated the usage of social media to engage pediatric cancer patients, survivors, their family caregivers, and healthcare providers in setting research priorities for the field of pediatric oncology. As a resource for other research teams, we offer a description of the traction gained by our social media campaign and factors contributing to an increased engagement in the priority-setting process. Social media-based strategies were utilized for participant recruitment; this included developing a website, launching graphics and advertisements, and engaging various stakeholders. Throughout the study duration, we gained 870 Instagram followers, 450 Twitter followers, 69 Facebook page likes, 27 TikTok followers, 20 LinkedIn followers, and 789 unique visitors to the study website. Social media is a relatively new approach to engage individuals for research priority-setting. Our study identified the following strategies as effective methods to increase engagement: (1) creating a unified branding, (2) prioritizing accessibility (e.g., providing alternative text for all images), (3) using various platforms and tailoring content to specific populations, and (4) optimizing campaign reach through paid advertisements and by circulating promotional material to partner organizations and individuals to share within their networks. Further investigation of the privacy implications of social media use for priority-setting research is needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to Dr. Lindsay Jibb. The grant number is PAO-169422.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for this study was received from the SickKids Research Ethics Board (REB). Consent for publication was not applicable. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
↵* Shared first authorship (KH and SS are Joint Senior Authors)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
ABBREVIATIONS
- BIPOC
- Black, Indigenous, People of Colour
- CIHR
- Canadian Institute of Health and Research
- COVID-19
- Coronavirus disease 2019
- GIFs
- Graphic interchange format
- PSP
- Priority setting partnership
- REB
- Research Ethics Board
- SEO
- Search optimization checklist
